The Realme C25 and vivo Y200+ represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The C25, leveraging the MediaTek Helio G70, aims for affordability and established reliability. The Y200+, however, introduces Qualcomm’s newer, more efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, alongside significantly faster charging. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance and faster charging, the vivo Y200+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers a noticeable efficiency and performance advantage over the Realme C25’s Helio G70, despite the C25’s lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2025, January 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 27 | Available. Released 2025, January 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF (International model)
or
13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF (India model)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Water Blue, Water Gray | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Models | RMX3193, RMX3191 | - |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.82 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
Realme C25
- Lower price point makes it very accessible.
- Reliable MediaTek Helio G70 chipset for basic tasks.
- Reverse wired charging offers added versatility.
- Less efficient 12nm process leads to more heat and throttling.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Potentially weaker camera performance.
vivo Y200+
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset.
- Significantly faster 44W charging.
- Improved CPU performance for smoother multitasking.
- Higher price compared to the Realme C25.
- May not offer substantial gaming improvements over the C25 for casual gamers.
- Reverse charging functionality is present but not a standout feature.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Y200+’s newer chipset *could* suggest a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and viewing angles, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume display quality won't be a major differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing. It’s safe to assume the Y200+ benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a 4nm chipset also allows for more efficient image processing, reducing noise and improving detail. The C25’s Helio G70 ISP is adequate for basic photography, but likely won’t match the Y200+’s capabilities. We can expect the Y200+ to deliver more consistently pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C25’s MediaTek Helio G70 (12nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The vivo Y200+ boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), utilizing 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm fabrication process is a significant advantage, offering superior power efficiency and thermal management. This translates to less throttling during sustained workloads and better battery life. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Y200+ also provide a performance uplift over the C25’s A75 cores, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both have octa-core CPUs, the architectural and process node differences heavily favor the Y200+.
Battery Life
The Realme C25 offers 18W wired charging, while the vivo Y200+ significantly steps up the game with 44W wired charging, promising a 50% charge in just 36 minutes. This is a substantial difference in real-world usability. While the C25’s battery capacity isn’t specified, it’s likely around 5000mAh, a common size for this segment. The Y200+’s battery capacity is also likely similar. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s superior efficiency means the Y200+ will likely achieve comparable or better battery life *despite* the faster charging, as it consumes less power during normal use. The 44W charging is a game-changer for users who value convenience and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C25 if you need a highly affordable device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with demanding gaming or future-proofing. Buy the vivo Y200+ if you prioritize smoother multitasking, improved gaming performance, and significantly faster 44W charging, even if it means spending a bit more upfront. The Y200+ is the better choice for users who want a phone that will remain responsive for longer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200+ handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 isn't a flagship gaming chip, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Helio G70 in the Realme C25. PUBG Mobile should be playable at medium settings with stable frame rates. However, for consistently high frame rates at maximum settings, a more powerful chipset would be required.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200+ compared to the Realme C25’s 18W charging in real-world use?
The 44W charging on the Y200+ is significantly faster. While the C25 might take over 2 hours for a full charge, the Y200+ can reach 50% in just 36 minutes and a full charge in approximately 1 hour. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 translate to a noticeable difference in battery life compared to the Realme C25?
Yes, the 4nm process is more power-efficient than the 12nm process used in the Helio G70. This means the Y200+ will consume less power for the same tasks, resulting in longer battery life, even with the faster charging capabilities. You can expect to get a few extra hours of usage on the Y200+.
