The Realme C17 and vivo Y200+ represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The C17, leveraging the older Snapdragon 460, aims for affordability. The Y200+, with its newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, attempts to bridge the gap between price and performance. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the vivo Y200+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Realme C17’s Snapdragon 460. The faster 44W charging is a substantial bonus.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 22 | 2025, January 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, January 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Navy Blue, Lake Green | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Models | RMX2101 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Realme C17
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Reliable Qualcomm chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Older Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Potentially limited performance for demanding apps
vivo Y200+
- Faster Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset (4nm)
- Significantly faster 44W charging with 50% in 36 min
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Higher price compared to the Realme C17
- May still struggle with graphically intensive games
- Potentially limited storage options
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Y200+’s higher price point *suggests* a potentially higher peak brightness and slightly better color accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume the Y200+ offers a marginally better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. The Y200+’s higher price point *implies* a potentially larger sensor and better image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 also includes an improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) compared to the 460, which could result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a dedicated ISP on the 4 Gen 2 will also allow for faster image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C17’s Snapdragon 460 (11nm) uses older Kryo 240 cores, while the vivo Y200+ boasts the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm). This process node difference is critical; 4nm allows for greater transistor density, resulting in improved performance and significantly better power efficiency. The Y200+’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the C17’s Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240), offering a noticeable boost in single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience for Y200+ users.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the charging capabilities are a key differentiator. The Realme C17’s 18W charging is relatively slow, requiring a significant amount of time to fully charge. The vivo Y200+’s 44W charging, capable of reaching 50% in 36 minutes, offers a dramatically faster charging experience. This is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Y200+ also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the C17, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C17 if you need a functional, extremely affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. Buy the vivo Y200+ if you prefer a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of rapid 44W charging, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200+ handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it offers a significant improvement over the Snapdragon 460. PUBG Mobile should be playable at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, demanding titles may require lower graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200+ compared to the 18W charging on the Realme C17 in real-world use?
The 44W charging on the Y200+ will drastically reduce charging times. While the C17 might take over 2 hours for a full charge, the Y200+ can reach 50% in just 36 minutes, and a full charge will likely take around an hour and a half. This is a substantial time saving for users on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offer any advantages in terms of software updates and longevity compared to the Snapdragon 460?
Generally, newer chipsets receive longer software support from manufacturers. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is more likely to receive future Android updates and security patches for a longer period than the older Snapdragon 460, extending the usable lifespan of the vivo Y200+.
