The Realme 9i and vivo T1x (India) occupy a fiercely competitive segment of the smartphone market, both powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison isn't about raw power – the chipsets are identical – but about how each manufacturer optimizes around it, specifically focusing on charging speed and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience, the Realme 9i emerges as the winner. While both phones offer the same Snapdragon 680 performance, the 33W charging capability of the Realme 9i drastically reduces charging times compared to the vivo T1x’s 18W, making it a more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 10 | 2022, July 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 10 | Available. Released 2022, July 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragontrail Pro), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Dragontrail Pro Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4 | Android, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 - Vietnam
UFS 2.1 - India | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 70 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Gravity Black, Space Blue |
| Models | RMX3491 | V2143 |
| Price | € 149.90 / $ 209.00 / £ 140.09 | About 150 EUR |
Realme 9i
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Identical Snapdragon 680 performance
- Potentially more vibrant display (based on Realme’s typical calibration)
- May have more aggressive software bloatware (based on Realme’s historical approach)
- Camera image processing may not appeal to all users
vivo T1x (India)
- Potentially cleaner software experience (based on vivo’s historical approach)
- Identical Snapdragon 680 performance
- May be available at a slightly lower price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Camera image processing may not appeal to all users
- Potentially less aggressive display calibration
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature similar LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Without specific display specs like peak brightness or color gamut coverage, it’s difficult to differentiate. However, Realme often employs slightly more aggressive color calibration, potentially offering a more vibrant (though less accurate) visual experience. Bezels are likely comparable, and neither phone is expected to feature high refresh rate panels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside depth and macro sensors. The image processing algorithms will be the key differentiator. Realme tends towards more saturated and contrast-boosted images, appealing to social media sharing, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which may struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Realme 9i and vivo T1x utilize the Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means app launch times, multitasking, and general responsiveness will be nearly indistinguishable. Thermal management will likely depend on the internal cooling solutions, a detail not provided, but the 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 680 should provide reasonable efficiency. RAM configurations are also likely similar, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, both phones likely house batteries in the 5000mAh range, standard for this segment. The critical difference lies in charging speed. The Realme 9i’s 33W wired charging promises a full charge in approximately 70 minutes, a substantial advantage over the vivo T1x’s 18W charging. This faster charging translates to less time tethered to a wall outlet, a significant benefit for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 9i if you need faster charging and prioritize minimizing downtime. Its 33W charging is a significant advantage for users constantly on the go. Buy the vivo T1x (India) if you prefer a potentially more refined software experience (based on vivo’s historical software approach) and are willing to trade charging speed for a potentially lower price point, though this will vary by retailer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will I notice a difference in gaming performance between the Realme 9i and vivo T1x?
No, you won't. Both phones utilize the same Snapdragon 680 chipset and CPU configuration, meaning gaming performance will be virtually identical. Frame rates and graphical fidelity will be limited by the chipset, not by differences between the phones themselves. Expect smooth performance in less demanding titles, but potential frame drops in graphically intensive games.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Realme 9i compared to the 18W charging on the vivo T1x in real-world use?
The Realme 9i’s 33W charging can realistically shave off around 30-45 minutes of charging time compared to the vivo T1x’s 18W charging. While the exact time will vary based on usage, the Realme 9i can reach 100% in approximately 70 minutes, while the vivo T1x will likely take closer to 90-100+ minutes.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in either phone support 90fps gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is not designed for sustained 90fps gaming in demanding titles. While it can achieve higher frame rates in lighter games, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain playable frame rates in games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. Expect a more consistent experience around 30-60fps.
