Realme 9 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and fast wired charging, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the better choice. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers a significantly brighter display and the added benefit of wireless charging, making it ideal for media consumption and those seeking all-day usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 9 Pro+ | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 21 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | RMX3392, RMX3393 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | £ 493.68 | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 9 Pro+
- Faster processor for demanding tasks
- Faster wired charging (60W)
- Slightly better battery endurance rating
- Dimmer display compared to the Motorola
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- Wireless charging support
- More power-efficient chipset
- Less powerful processor
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits compared to the Realme 9 Pro+'s 613 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the brighter display of the Motorola will draw more power. The Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong OLED panel, likely contributing to deeper blacks. The Realme 9 Pro+ display specs lack contrast ratio data, suggesting it may not be as visually striking in high-contrast scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. The lack of specifics makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Realme 9 Pro+ may prioritize camera features more heavily, potentially offering a larger main sensor or more advanced image processing. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s focus appears to be on overall user experience, with camera performance likely being good but not class-leading. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range.
Performance
The Realme 9 Pro+ is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 920, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold). This translates to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. However, the Snapdragon 695’s architecture is generally more power-efficient, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 920 is a higher-tier chipset, offering a more substantial GPU advantage for gaming.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+ has an endurance rating of 117 hours, while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo scores 104 hours. Despite a slightly smaller battery, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo compensates with 68W wired charging *and* 5W wireless charging. The Realme 9 Pro+ offers 60W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in 44 minutes. The addition of wireless charging on the Motorola provides a convenient top-up option, while the faster wired charging on the Realme minimizes downtime. The difference in endurance ratings suggests the Snapdragon 695’s efficiency partially offsets the smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Its Dimensity 920 chipset delivers a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a vibrant, easily visible display, value wireless charging convenience, and prioritize all-day battery life over absolute peak performance.