Realme 9 Pro+ vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme 9 Pro+ emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster 60W charging, superior camera system (likely including OIS), and potentially better display quality. The Narzo 50 Pro offers a more budget-friendly option, but compromises on charging and camera performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 9 Pro+ | Realme Narzo 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, May 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 21 | Available. Released 2022, May 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black |
| Models | RMX3392, RMX3393 | RMX3395, RMX3396 |
| Price | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme 9 Pro+
- 60W Fast Charging
- Superior Camera System (likely OIS)
- Potentially Better Display (higher refresh rate, resolution)
- Premium Build Quality (likely)
- Better Thermal Management
- Higher Price
- Potentially Larger Size/Weight
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- More Affordable
- Decent Performance with Dimensity 920
- Reliable Battery Life
- Sleek Design
- Slower 33W Charging
- Less Advanced Camera System
- Standard 60Hz Display
- Potentially Lower Build Quality
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 6.43-inch or similar sized display, but the 9 Pro+ is expected to have a higher resolution (FHD+) and potentially a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) for smoother scrolling and gaming. The Narzo 50 Pro likely has a standard 60Hz refresh rate. Contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the 9 Pro+, suggesting a potentially better display panel.
Camera Comparison
The Realme 9 Pro+ is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor (likely 50MP with OIS), an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. The Narzo 50 Pro's camera setup is likely more basic, potentially lacking OIS. Video recording capabilities are also likely superior on the 9 Pro+.
Performance
Sharing the same Dimensity 920 chipset and CPU configuration, both phones offer similar processing power for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, the 9 Pro+ might have slightly better thermal management due to potentially improved cooling solutions.
Battery Life
While both phones have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the Realme 9 Pro+'s 60W fast charging significantly outperforms the Narzo 50 Pro's 33W charging. This translates to much faster charging times and greater convenience.
Buying Guide
The Realme 9 Pro+ is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a high-quality camera, and a premium feel. The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a good choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a decent performance and a reliable smartphone experience.