Realme 9 5G Speed vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 5G Speed offers a compelling package with its significantly faster 30W charging. While the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a proven 113-hour endurance rating, the Realme’s quicker top-ups and similar performance make it the more practical choice for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 9 5G Speed | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - International | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 10 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 14 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Glow, Azure Glow | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | RMX3461 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 240 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 9 5G Speed
- Faster 30W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Identical Snapdragon 778G performance to the A52s 5G.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Battery life may be shorter than the A52s 5G.
- Thermal throttling could be a concern under heavy load.
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Exceptional 113-hour battery endurance.
- 800 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Samsung’s established reputation for software and support.
- Slower 25W charging.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Realme 9 5G Speed.
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data, but the Galaxy A52s 5G is confirmed to reach 800 nits of peak brightness, suggesting a more visible screen outdoors. Given Samsung’s display expertise, it likely benefits from superior color calibration and viewing angles. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but hints at a good quality AMOLED panel. Realme’s display specs are absent, making a direct comparison difficult, but it likely targets a similar level of quality within the price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. The absence of information on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive camera comparison impossible. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on computational photography to enhance image quality. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this price range are unlikely to deliver significant improvements over the main sensor. The image processing style will likely differ, with Samsung leaning towards more saturated colors and Realme aiming for a more natural look.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Realme 9 5G Speed and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55). This means comparable performance in everyday tasks and gaming. However, thermal management could differ; Realme’s thinner design might lead to more throttling under sustained load, while Samsung’s larger chassis could offer better heat dissipation. RAM configurations are not specified, but faster LPDDR5 RAM would benefit both devices.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, it’s paired with a slower 25W charging solution. The Realme 9 5G Speed, conversely, offers 30W charging, allowing it to reach 50% charge in just 25 minutes. While the exact battery capacity of the Realme is unknown, the faster charging speed is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The A52s 5G prioritizes longevity, while the Realme prioritizes convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 9 5G Speed if you prioritize rapid charging and don't mind potentially shorter battery life between charges. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their devices throughout the day. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value long-lasting battery life above all else and prefer a device with a well-established track record for endurance, even if it means slower charging speeds.