The Realme 7 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The Realme 7 prioritizes gaming prowess with its Helio G95 chipset, while the Moto G9 Plus leans towards all-day battery life and a more efficient processor.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and faster charging, the Realme 7 is the better choice. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus edges ahead for those who value extended battery life and a slightly brighter display, offering a more balanced daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 07. Released 2020, October 21 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.4 x 9.4 mm (6.39 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196.5 g (6.95 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 65 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mist Blue, Mist White | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | RMX2155 | XT2087-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 7
- Faster charging speeds (50% in 26 mins)
- Potentially higher gaming performance due to Helio G95
- Slightly higher nominal contrast ratio
- Less battery endurance (126h vs 136h)
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- Longer battery life (136h endurance)
- Brighter display (522 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 730G chipset
- Slightly slower charging (full charge takes longer)
- Potentially lower peak gaming performance
- Nominally lower contrast ratio
Display Comparison
Both phones feature nominally similar contrast ratios around 1356:1 to 1474:1, suggesting comparable black levels. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits, significantly exceeding what we can infer about the Realme 7’s brightness. This makes the Moto G9 Plus more usable in direct sunlight. While both displays are adequate, the G9 Plus’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor viewing. The Realme 7’s slightly higher nominal contrast ratio may offer marginally deeper blacks in controlled environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the context data lacks specifics to draw definitive conclusions. Given the market positioning, it’s likely both rely on similar sensor sizes and image processing techniques. Without detailed sensor specifications, it’s difficult to assess image quality differences. However, the Snapdragon 730G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Moto G9 Plus. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes prevents a more granular comparison.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, fabricated on an 8nm process, offering a more efficient architecture than the Realme 7’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). While the Realme 7’s CPU clocks slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the G9 Plus’s Kryo 470 Gold cores), the Snapdragon 730G’s superior architecture and process node translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The G95 is geared towards raw gaming power, but the 730G provides a smoother, more consistent experience across a wider range of tasks. The G9 Plus’s Kryo cores are also more efficient, contributing to the longer battery life.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus claims an endurance rating of 136 hours, exceeding the Realme 7’s 126 hours. This difference is likely attributable to the Snapdragon 730G’s 8nm efficiency. Both phones support 30W wired charging, with the Realme 7 achieving 50% charge in 26 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. While the Moto G9 Plus has the same charging wattage, its larger battery capacity (implied by the higher endurance rating) means it will take slightly longer to fully charge. The G9 Plus’s efficiency advantage translates to more screen-on time per charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 7 if you're a mobile gamer who needs a responsive processor and quick charging to get back into the action. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a more efficient chipset for everyday tasks. The G9 Plus is ideal for users who aren't heavily invested in demanding mobile games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the Realme 7 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is a capable gaming chip, but its 12nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 730G’s 8nm process. This means the Realme 7 is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced performance over time. While it will handle most games, the Moto G9 Plus offers more consistent performance under sustained load.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the battery endurance rating make?
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s 136-hour endurance rating translates to noticeably longer battery life in typical usage. Expect to get through a full day of moderate use with battery to spare, whereas the Realme 7 might require a top-up charge if you’re a heavy user. The Snapdragon 730G’s efficiency is the key factor here.
❓ Is the 30W charging on both phones equally fast in practice?
While both support 30W charging, the Realme 7 charges slightly faster to 50% (26 minutes) due to its optimized charging curve. However, the Moto G9 Plus’s larger battery capacity means it will take longer to reach 100%, despite the same wattage. The difference isn’t massive, but the Realme 7 offers a quicker boost when you’re short on time.
