The Realme 7 (Asia variant) and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they take different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging speed. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Realme 7 emerges as the winner. Its Helio G95 chipset, while older, delivers a noticeable performance edge. However, the Moto G 5G’s Snapdragon 750G offers superior efficiency and 5G modem capabilities, making it a strong contender for those valuing battery life and network performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 10 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.4 x 9.4 mm (6.39 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196.5 g (6.95 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (Indonesia only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 65 min | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mist Blue, Mist White | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | RMX2151, RMX2163 | - |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 7 (Asia)
- Faster 30W charging for quick top-ups
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher CPU performance in short bursts
- Less efficient 12nm chipset may lead to more heat
- Battery life potentially lower than Moto G 5G
Motorola Moto G 5G
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Excellent battery endurance (131h rating)
- Potentially better 5G modem performance
- Slower 20W charging
- Dimmer display compared to Realme 7
Display Comparison
Both the Realme 7 and Moto G 5G feature displays with similar contrast ratios – 1474:1 and 1419:1 respectively – suggesting comparable black levels and overall image depth. However, the Realme 7 boasts a brighter panel at 525 nits compared to the Moto G 5G’s 484 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While neither display utilizes advanced technologies like LTPO, the Realme 7’s higher brightness provides a more comfortable viewing experience in brighter environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics to make a definitive judgment. Without sensor size, aperture details, or image processing information, a comparison is limited. It’s reasonable to assume both phones target the mid-range camera experience, focusing on versatility rather than flagship-level image quality. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance as a key selling point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 7 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G95, built on a 12nm process, featuring an octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Moto G 5G, conversely, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, fabricated on a more efficient 8nm node, with an octa-core setup of two Kryo 570 cores at 2.2 GHz and six Kryo 570 cores at 1.8 GHz. The Snapdragon 750G’s 8nm process offers better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. While the Realme 7’s CPU clock speeds are slightly higher, the Snapdragon 750G’s architecture and efficiency gains likely translate to smoother overall performance, especially in 5G-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G boasts an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating strong battery life. While the Realme 7’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 30W wired charging significantly outperforms the Moto G 5G’s 20W charging. The Realme 7 can reach 50% charge in just 26 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes, offering a substantial convenience advantage. This faster charging partially offsets any potential battery capacity difference, making the Realme 7 more appealing for users who frequently need to top up their device quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 7 (Asia) if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming and appreciate significantly faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who frequently push their device’s limits. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize battery endurance, a more efficient 5G experience, and a cleaner software experience. It’s a better fit for everyday users who value reliability and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Realme 7 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95, being built on a 12nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 750G’s 8nm process. While it offers strong initial performance, expect some performance reduction after prolonged gaming. Active cooling solutions or limiting graphics settings may be necessary for sustained gameplay.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 750G's 5G performance compare to other 5G chipsets in the same price range?
The Snapdragon 750G is a solid mid-range 5G chipset. It offers good 5G connectivity and efficiency, but it's not as powerful as flagship 5G chipsets. However, it generally outperforms competing chipsets in the same price bracket in terms of 5G modem performance and power efficiency.
❓ Is the 20W charging on the Moto G 5G slow compared to other phones in this price range?
20W charging is becoming less common as faster charging technologies proliferate. While not the slowest, it's significantly slower than the Realme 7's 30W charging. Expect a longer charging time to reach 100%, potentially taking over two hours.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in app loading times between the two phones?
While both phones have sufficient RAM, the Snapdragon 750G's architecture and efficiency give it a slight edge in app loading and multitasking. You'll likely notice a smoother experience with the Moto G 5G, especially when switching between multiple apps.
