The Realme 3 Pro and Oppo F9 (often referred to as F9 Pro) were popular contenders in the budget smartphone arena. Both offered compelling features for their price, but which one truly delivered the better experience? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and performance to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F9 edges out the Realme 3 Pro thanks to its superior sunlight visibility and slightly better battery life. However, the Realme 3 Pro's Snapdragon 710 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost for gaming and demanding tasks. Ultimately, it depends on your priorities: photography and outdoor use favor the Oppo, while performance leans towards the Realme.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - all versions |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, April 22. Released 2019, May | 2018, August. Released 2018, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 74.2 x 8.3 mm (6.17 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 156.7 x 74 x 8 mm (6.17 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 6 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.6", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/3.1, 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Music play | Up to 126 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 383 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 32 h (3G) | - |
| Type | 4045 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Gray, Nitro Blue, Lightning Purple | Sunrise Red, Twilight Blue, Starry Purple, Jade Green |
| Models | RMX1851 | CPH1823, CPH1881, CPH1825 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -91.1dB |
Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 91h
|
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1782:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1814:1 (nominal), 3.069 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 90dB
|
Voice 71dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 155647 (v7)
GeekBench: 5881 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
GeekBench: 5673 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 3 Pro
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 710)
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Camera
- Fast Charging
- Sunlight Visibility Not as Good as Oppo F9
- Image Processing Can Be Less Consistent
Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
- Excellent Sunlight Visibility
- Good Battery Life
- Vibrant Display
- Stylish Design
- Less Powerful Processor
- Gaming Performance Not as Strong
- Image Processing Can Be Over-Saturated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (1782:1 for Realme, 1814:1 for Oppo). However, the Oppo F9 shines in direct sunlight with a remarkable 3.069 contrast ratio, making it significantly easier to view content outdoors. The Realme 3 Pro's display is still good, but not as impressive in bright conditions. Both have similar resolutions and sizes, around 6.3 inches.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable, with both phones offering decent photo and video capabilities. The Oppo F9 often has slightly better image processing, producing more vibrant colors. The Realme 3 Pro's camera can sometimes produce more natural-looking images. Low-light performance is adequate on both, but not exceptional. Both typically feature a dual-camera setup with a primary sensor and a depth sensor for portrait mode.
Performance
The Realme 3 Pro boasts a Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 chipset, a more powerful processor than the Oppo F9's MediaTek Helio P60. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Realme 3 Pro handles demanding games with ease, while the Oppo F9 might struggle with higher graphics settings. Both have ample RAM (typically 4GB or 6GB) for everyday use.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings around 91-94 hours. The Oppo F9 has a slight edge in this category. Both support 20W fast charging, allowing for a 50% charge in approximately 30 minutes. Battery capacity is around 3500mAh on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Realme 3 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming on a budget. If you frequently use your phone outdoors and value a vibrant display with excellent sunlight readability, the Oppo F9 is the better choice. Consider your usage patterns and budget carefully.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme 3 Pro good for gaming?
Yes, the Realme 3 Pro's Snapdragon 710 chipset makes it a decent gaming phone for its price range. It can handle most games smoothly, although you might need to adjust graphics settings for demanding titles.
❓ Which phone has better camera quality overall?
It's close, but the Oppo F9 often produces more vibrant and visually appealing photos thanks to its image processing. However, the Realme 3 Pro can sometimes capture more natural-looking images.
