The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme 15 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options. The Realme 15 arrives with the newer Mediatek Dimensity 7300+ chipset, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leverages the Dimensity 7030, alongside a focus on battery endurance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Realme 15 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300+ chipset offers a noticeable step up in CPU and GPU capabilities. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo counters with impressive battery life, making it a strong contender for those who value longevity over peak speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 18 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300+ (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 61 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk Pink, Suit Titanium | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5106 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 15
- Faster processor with Dimensity 7300+
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid refills
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Battery capacity currently unknown
- Display specifications not yet available
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright 1073 nit display
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor compared to Realme 15
- 68W charging is slower than Realme 15
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a bright display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. While the Realme 15’s display specifications are currently unavailable, the Edge 40 Neo’s high brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely utilizes a high refresh rate, common in this segment, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. Without Realme 15’s display specs, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or panel technology (like LTPO), but the Edge 40 Neo sets a high bar for visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information on the Realme 15. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is described as capable of both photo and video, but lacks specific sensor details. It’s reasonable to assume a primary sensor of at least 50MP, given the market trends. Without knowing the Realme 15’s sensor sizes, apertures, and OIS implementation, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s image processing style will likely lean towards vibrant colors and balanced exposure, typical of Motorola’s approach.
Performance
The Realme 15’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300+ (4nm) chipset represents a significant advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Realme 15’s CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) also boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster app loading times and a more responsive user experience. While both utilize Mali GPUs, the 7300+’s superior architecture will deliver a more fluid gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This suggests a well-optimized software and efficient chipset. The Realme 15 compensates with significantly faster charging – 80W wired, reaching 50% in 25 minutes and 100% in 61 minutes, compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W (50% in 15 minutes). While the Realme 15’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging mitigates concerns about potentially smaller battery size, offering quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 15 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast 80W charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life and a balanced experience, and are less concerned with having the absolute fastest processor in this price bracket.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300+ in the Realme 15 get noticeably warmer than the Dimensity 7030 during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7300+'s 4nm process should result in better thermal efficiency, meaning it's likely to run cooler than the 6nm Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo during prolonged gaming. However, thermal performance also depends on the phone's cooling system, which is currently unknown for the Realme 15.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Realme 15 compared to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo in real-world use?
While both offer fast charging, the Realme 15's 80W charging is demonstrably quicker. It reaches 50% charge in 25 minutes, while the Edge 40 Neo takes 15 minutes. The difference becomes more pronounced when charging from lower percentages, offering a significant time saving for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will the Realme 15's processor handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact at high settings without significant frame drops?
The Dimensity 7300+ is a capable chipset and should handle Genshin Impact at high settings with reasonable frame rates. However, sustained performance will depend on the phone's thermal management. Expect some frame drops during extended gaming sessions, but overall, the experience should be smoother than on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo.
