The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme 15 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options. The Realme 15 Pro aims for all-day battery and rapid charging, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo focuses on a sleek design and balanced performance. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and sustained performance, the Realme 15 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 17:04h active use battery score and faster 80W charging outweigh the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s more refined design and slightly quicker initial charging burst.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 24 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 30 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 76.2 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4608Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 25 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 7000 mAh - India, China· Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh - ROW | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Silk Purple, Velvet Green, Game of Thrones Limited Edition | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5101 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 30,399 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 15 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (17:04h active use)
- Faster 80W wired charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
- Display brightness is the only standout feature
- Camera details are currently unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Faster initial charging speed (0-50% in 15 mins)
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Less efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Realme 15 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1862 nits, compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels (not specified), the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The lack of refresh rate information for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but the brightness difference is a substantial differentiator for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is marketed with a focus on photo and video capabilities, suggesting a potentially more refined camera system. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both phones will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the Realme 15 Pro’s chipset might offer superior image signal processing capabilities.
Performance
The Realme 15 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) chipset offers a more modern architecture than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node generally leads to improved power efficiency and thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s CPU configuration – a 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 prime core alongside Cortex-720 and Cortex-520 cores – suggests a performance advantage over the Edge 40 Neo’s 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Realme 15 Pro truly shines. Its active use score of 17:04h is a substantial improvement over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h suggests good standby time, the Realme’s real-world usage is significantly longer. The Realme 15 Pro also supports 80W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 25 minutes, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging takes 15 minutes to reach 50%. Although the Motorola charges slightly faster initially, the Realme’s overall battery capacity and endurance are more compelling.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 15 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for power users, frequent travelers, or those who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset also provides a performance edge for demanding tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a more premium aesthetic, a lighter form factor, and a generally smooth user experience for everyday tasks, accepting a trade-off in battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 in the Realme 15 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a capable chipset, and should handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. However, sustained performance will depend on the phone's thermal management, and the 4nm process should help mitigate throttling compared to the Edge 40 Neo's 6nm Dimensity 7030.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compare to other phones in its price range?
68W charging is relatively fast, but it's becoming increasingly common in the mid-range segment. While it charges to 50% in 15 minutes, the Realme 15 Pro’s 80W charging offers a slight edge in overall charging speed, and the larger battery means it will take longer to fully charge either device.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 800+ nit difference in peak brightness is significant. The Realme 15 Pro’s display will be much easier to see outdoors, especially in direct sunlight. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s display may appear washed out in bright conditions.
