Realme 15 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Realme 15 Pro emerges as the winner. Its impressive 17:04h active use battery score and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7a’s endurance rating and slower 18W charging. However, the Pixel 7a’s superior image processing and Google’s software experience remain strong contenders for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 15 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 24 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 30 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 76.2 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4608Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 25 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 7000 mAh - India, China· Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh - ROW | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Silk Purple, Velvet Green, Game of Thrones Limited Edition | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | RMX5101 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 30,399 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Realme 15 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (17:04h active use)
- Ultra-fast 80W charging (50% in 25 min)
- Significantly brighter display (1862 nits)
- Camera performance likely trails the Pixel 7a
- Software experience may not be as refined as Google’s
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera image processing
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Powerful Tensor G2 chip for burst performance
- Slower 18W charging
- Lower peak display brightness (1070 nits)
- Shorter battery life compared to Realme 15 Pro
Display Comparison
The Realme 15 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1862 nits, compared to the Pixel 7a’s 1070 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use. We lack PWM frequency data, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator. The Pixel 7a’s display, while still good, is noticeably dimmer in comparison, impacting outdoor readability.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera prowess is well-documented, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s strength lies in its image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent photos and videos. The Realme 15 Pro’s camera performance is less known, but the absence of details suggests it may not compete directly with the Pixel’s image quality. The Pixel’s focus on software-driven enhancements gives it an edge, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We'd need sample images to make a definitive judgement.
Performance
The chipset choice defines the performance profiles of these phones. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core, designed for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Realme 15 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) with a Cortex-720 based core configuration. While the Tensor G2’s X1 core offers a theoretical performance edge in single-threaded tasks, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s more efficient 4nm process and optimized core arrangement likely provide better sustained performance and thermal management during prolonged gaming sessions. The Realme’s architecture suggests a focus on efficiency, while the Pixel prioritizes burst performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The Realme 15 Pro achieves an impressive 17:04h of active use, far exceeding the Pixel 7a’s reported 76h endurance rating (which is an older metric and not directly comparable to active use). Furthermore, the Realme 15 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, reaching 50% charge in just 25 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0, is considerably slower. The Realme’s combination of longer battery life and faster charging provides a substantial convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 15 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a bright, vibrant display for media consumption. It’s ideal for users who are constantly on the go and demand a phone that can keep up. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize computational photography, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and a more refined software ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and charging speed.