Realme 15 Lite vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a remains the superior choice. However, the Realme 15 Lite delivers impressive charging speeds and a modern chipset at a potentially lower price point, making it a strong contender for those focused on value and quick power-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 15 Lite | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 74.7 x 7.6 mm (6.37 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Green, Glitter Gold, Electric Purple | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | RMX5000 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Realme 15 Lite
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast power-ups
- Modern Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset (4nm)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Camera performance likely trails behind the Pixel 7a
- Software updates may be less frequent than on the Pixel
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Google Tensor G2 chip with AI-powered features
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Slower 18W charging
- Older chipset compared to the Realme 15 Lite
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a features a display capable of reaching 1070 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Realme 15 Lite’s display specifications are currently unavailable, Realme typically equips its devices with vibrant panels. The Pixel 7a’s display technology is a key advantage, offering a brighter and potentially more color-accurate viewing experience. The Pixel 7a’s display is likely to have a higher pixel density, resulting in sharper images and text, though this is unconfirmed for the Realme 15 Lite.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is renowned for its camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the Realme 15 Lite, the Pixel 7a’s image processing pipeline consistently delivers exceptional dynamic range and accurate colors. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light photography, thanks to its advanced algorithms. The Realme 15 Lite will likely focus on providing a versatile camera system, but it will be challenging to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality without similar software optimization. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also superior, offering features like Cinematic Pan and improved stabilization.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) chipset, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offers a performance edge over the Realme 15 Lite’s Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm). The Tensor G2’s architecture prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. However, the Dimensity 7300 Energy’s 4nm process should provide better power efficiency. The Pixel 7a’s CPU configuration (2x2.85GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80GHz Cortex-A55) is geared towards sustained performance, while the Realme 15 Lite’s (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) may excel in bursty workloads. The Pixel 7a benefits from Google’s software optimization, further enhancing its performance.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 7a boasts an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Realme 15 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging is a significant advantage. This allows for incredibly fast charging times, potentially reaching 100% in under 30 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is comparatively slow. The Realme 15 Lite’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery capacity, allowing users to quickly replenish their battery throughout the day. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Realme 15 Lite.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 15 Lite if you need exceptionally fast charging and prioritize a newer chipset for potentially longer software support. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their battery and want a device that feels current. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software updates directly from Google, and a proven track record of image processing excellence. This is the phone for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.