Realme 14x vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing exceptional battery life and sustained performance under load, the Realme 14x emerges as the winner. Its 65:33h endurance significantly outpaces the Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score. However, the Galaxy A55 counters with a brighter, more vibrant display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 14x | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 24 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 24 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Peridot Green, Carbon Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | RMX5020, RMX3943 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | € 109.00 / $ 142.11 / £ 139.00 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme 14x
- Exceptional battery life (65:33h endurance)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to efficient chipset
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Display likely lacks the brightness and vibrancy of the A55
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter, more vibrant display (1010 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 1480)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:27h)
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Realme 14x, which lacks specific brightness data. While the Realme 14x’s panel characteristics are unknown, the A55’s brightness and likely superior color calibration make it the better choice for media consumption and outdoor use. The A55’s panel is also likely to have a higher refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature not mentioned for the Realme 14x.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given Samsung’s history, the Galaxy A55 likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Realme 14x may focus on delivering competitive specs at a lower price point, potentially sacrificing some image quality. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 would be a key differentiator, improving low-light performance and video stabilization. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of camera modes, but the A55 is likely to offer more advanced features.
Performance
Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset offers a performance edge over the Realme 14x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – utilizes more powerful Cortex-A78 cores compared to the A76 cores in the Realme 14x’s Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during demanding tasks. However, the Realme 14x’s chipset is still capable, and its efficiency may contribute to its impressive battery life.
Battery Life
The Realme 14x dominates in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 65:33h rating. This is significantly higher than the Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score. While the A55 charges faster at 25W compared to the 14x’s 15W, the Realme’s larger battery capacity and potentially more efficient chipset allow it to maintain a substantial lead in longevity. The 1000 cycle rating for the Realme 14x also suggests a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 14x if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently engage in extended gaming sessions where sustained performance is critical. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize a visually immersive experience with a bright, high-contrast display, and value Samsung’s established software ecosystem and brand reputation.