Realme 14x vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and a more polished experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its significantly faster 68W charging and brighter 1073 nit display outweigh the Realme 14x’s longer battery endurance, especially considering the similar chipsets.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 14x | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 24 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Peridot Green, Carbon Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5020, RMX3943 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 109.00 / $ 142.11 / £ 139.00 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme 14x
- Exceptional battery endurance (65:33h)
- Long-term battery health with 1000 charge cycles
- Potentially lower price point
- Slow 15W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Bright 1073 nit display
- Slightly more powerful CPU (Dimensity 7030)
- Shorter battery endurance compared to Realme 14x
- Potentially higher price
- Battery health may degrade faster with frequent fast charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, compared to the Realme 14x which lacks published brightness data. This difference translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. We expect the Realme 14x to have a more standard brightness level, adequate for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer detailed camera specifications for either device. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that the Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Motorola often emphasizes photo and video capabilities in its Edge series. The Realme 14x, while potentially offering a decent camera for the price, is likely to prioritize other features. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the Edge 40 Neo’s branding suggests a stronger focus on imaging.
Performance
Both devices are powered by MediaTek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a slight edge. Its CPU features 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, compared to the Realme 14x’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While the core count is identical, the A78 architecture generally offers better single-core performance. Both phones utilize a 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration for efficiency cores. Real-world performance will likely be similar for everyday tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo may exhibit slightly faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Realme 14x claims an impressive 65:33h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles, indicating a focus on long-term battery health and longevity. However, its 15W wired charging is significantly slower than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, which promises a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h, while not directly comparable to the Realme’s active use score, suggests comparable overall battery life despite the faster charging. The Realme 14x excels in sustained usage, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 14x if you absolutely need the longest possible battery life and are willing to sacrifice charging speed and display brightness. This phone is ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a vibrant display, rapid charging, and a more modern feature set. It’s perfect for users who want a phone that can quickly top up and offers a more enjoyable viewing experience.