Realme 14x vs Honor X9b: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and consistent performance, the Realme 14x emerges as the winner. Its 65:33h endurance significantly outpaces the Honor X9b, making it ideal for heavy users. However, the Honor X9b’s faster 35W charging and more modern chipset architecture offer compelling advantages for those who value quick top-ups and potentially better sustained performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 14x | Honor X9b |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 24 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 24 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 35W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Peridot Green, Carbon Black | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | RMX5020, RMX3943 | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | € 109.00 / $ 142.11 / £ 139.00 | About 970 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme 14x
- Exceptional battery life (65:33h endurance)
- Potentially strong multi-core performance
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Less efficient chipset fabrication (6nm)
Honor X9b
- Faster charging (35W with reverse wired)
- More efficient chipset fabrication (4nm)
- Architecturally superior CPU cores (Cortex-A78)
- Lower battery endurance
- Potentially more susceptible to throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the price bracket, both devices likely feature LCD panels. The key differentiator will be resolution and refresh rate, which are unknown. However, the overall user experience will depend on color accuracy and brightness, which are not specified. Without this data, a direct comparison is impossible, but we can assume both will target a 60Hz refresh rate to maximize battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are unavailable, making a meaningful comparison impossible. However, given the price segment, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Image quality will heavily rely on software processing and the capabilities of the main sensor, which is unknown for both devices. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, we can only speculate.
Performance
The Realme 14x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) and the Honor X9b’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) represent distinct approaches to mobile processing. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, built on a smaller 4nm process, theoretically offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 6300. While the Dimensity 6300 utilizes Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4GHz, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 employs Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2GHz. The A78 cores are architecturally more advanced, potentially delivering better single-core performance. However, the Realme 14x’s octa-core configuration (2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz) might offer better multi-core performance in heavily threaded tasks. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s efficiency gains are likely to be more noticeable during sustained workloads, reducing throttling and maintaining consistent frame rates.
Battery Life
The Realme 14x boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance with a reported 65:33h runtime. This is a substantial lead over what we’d expect from the Honor X9b, given the lack of battery capacity data. The Realme 14x’s 15W charging is considerably slower than the Honor X9b’s 35W wired charging, which also includes reverse wired charging. The Honor X9b will offer a much quicker top-up time, potentially going from 0-100% in under an hour, while the Realme 14x will likely take over two hours. The Realme 14x prioritizes longevity, while the Honor X9b focuses on convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 14x if you need exceptional battery life and a reliable performer for everyday tasks. It’s the perfect choice for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day. Buy the Honor X9b if you prefer faster charging speeds, a more modern chipset fabrication process, and potentially better sustained performance during demanding tasks, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.