Realme 14 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and potentially longer software support, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging, achieving 50% in just 15 minutes, significantly outperforms the Realme 14’s 45W. However, the Realme 14’s newer chipset architecture offers a glimpse of future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 14 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.7 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Titanium, Pink | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5070 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:12h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme 14
- Longer battery lifespan (1400 charge cycles)
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Missing display specifications
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Higher CPU clock speeds
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Lower battery charge cycle count
- Endurance rating suggests smaller battery capacity
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, peaking at 1073 nits, which translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While the Realme 14’s display specifications are absent, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is significant. The Motorola’s panel likely utilizes a higher peak brightness setting to compensate for its 6nm chipset’s potential thermal output. Color accuracy and panel type (likely OLED on both) are unknown for the Realme 14, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information on the Realme 14. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera capabilities are described as ‘Photo / Video’ without specifics. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera setups, but sensor size, aperture, and optical image stabilization (OIS) details are missing for the Realme 14. Without this data, it’s difficult to assess the camera performance gap. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera is likely tuned for vibrant colors and social media sharing, a common Motorola trait.
Performance
The Realme 14’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s 4nm process should offer better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. However, the Dimensity 7030’s CPU configuration – with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – provides a higher peak clock speed than the Realme 14’s 2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s. This suggests the Motorola might offer a slight edge in single-core tasks. The Realme 14’s CPU configuration, with a mix of A720s and A520s cores, indicates a focus on balancing performance and efficiency. The Edge 40 Neo’s older 6nm process may result in higher temperatures under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is a standout feature, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Realme 14’s 45W charging, which takes 30 minutes for the same level. While the Realme 14 boasts a 70:12h endurance rating and 1400 charge cycles, suggesting excellent long-term battery health, the Edge 40 Neo’s older 80h endurance rating indicates a potentially smaller battery capacity. The Realme 14’s higher charge cycle count is a significant advantage for users who frequently charge their phones, potentially extending the battery’s lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 14 if you need a phone with a focus on long-term battery health, as its 1400 charge cycles suggest greater longevity. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility (1073 nits) and significantly faster charging speeds, making it ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day.