The Realme 14 Pro Lite and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Realme focuses on efficiency with its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Poco F5 Pro aims for outright performance with the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, particularly for gaming and demanding applications, and its 67W charging is noticeably faster. While the Realme 14 Pro Lite offers respectable efficiency, the Poco F5 Pro delivers a more premium experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 05 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 05 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (Hi-Res audio) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Gold, Glass Purple | Black, White |
| Models | - | 23013PC75G |
| Price | ₹ 18,899 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 14 Pro Lite
- Potentially better power efficiency with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Sleek design (assumed based on Realme's design language)
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Significantly less powerful processor than the Poco F5 Pro
- Slower charging speeds (45W vs 67W)
- Missing wireless charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster 67W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially lower battery efficiency compared to the Realme
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Realme 14 Pro Lite. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. While the Realme's panel characteristics are unknown, the Poco F5 Pro's brightness advantage is a clear win for media consumption and outdoor usability. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life during sustained high-refresh-rate usage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Realme 14 Pro Lite. The Poco F5 Pro’s camera system is likely to benefit from the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s superior image signal processor (ISP). Without specific details on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS) for the Realme, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the Poco F5 Pro’s ISP will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume the Poco F5 Pro will have a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the Realme 14 Pro Lite’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), which utilizes a Cortex-A78 based core configuration peaking at 2.40 GHz. The 8+ Gen 1’s superior architecture and higher clock speeds will result in significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. While both are built on a 4nm process, the 8+ Gen 1’s architecture is more efficient at handling sustained workloads. The Poco F5 Pro is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery performance despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W wired charging is significantly faster than the Realme 14 Pro Lite’s 45W charging, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes versus 27 minutes. The Poco F5 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Realme. While both offer comparable battery life, the Poco F5 Pro’s faster wired and wireless charging provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 14 Pro Lite if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks, and are comfortable with slightly less demanding gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value faster charging speeds and a brighter display. The Poco F5 Pro is the better choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, the Poco F5 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate throttling and maintain stable performance during gaming. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of significant performance degradation.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Realme 14 Pro Lite compare to the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro is noticeably faster. It can charge to 50% in 15 minutes, while the Realme 14 Pro Lite takes 27 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Realme 14 Pro Lite a cause for concern?
Yes, it is. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and OIS suggests the camera system may not be a primary strength of the device. The Poco F5 Pro, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ISP, is likely to offer a more capable and versatile camera experience.
