The Realme 13+ and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, they approach performance and features with distinct philosophies. The Realme 13+ prioritizes rapid charging and a newer chipset, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo focuses on a balanced experience with strong battery endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, the Realme 13+ emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Energy, built on a 4nm process, offers a slight performance edge and faster charging times. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s excellent battery life makes it a strong contender for those who value longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 06 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 74.7 x 7.6 mm (6.37 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Victory Gold, Speed Green, Dark Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5002, RMX5000 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 13+
- Faster 80W charging for quick power-ups
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Battery life details currently unknown
- Display brightness likely lower than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright 1073 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Balanced overall experience
- Slower 68W charging
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Realme 13+’s display specifications are currently unavailable, we can infer that it likely doesn’t match the Neo’s peak brightness. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness level suggests a strong experience for media consumption in various lighting conditions. Without further details on the Realme 13+’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate), the Edge 40 Neo currently holds the display advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the Realme 13+ are currently unavailable. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera capabilities are described as 'Photo / Video,' lacking specific sensor details. Without knowing the main sensor resolution, aperture, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will likely feature capable, but not flagship-level, camera systems. We can assume both will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality.
Performance
The Realme 13+ utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is powered by the Dimensity 7030 (6nm) with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy provides a theoretical advantage in power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030. While both chips feature the same peak Cortex-A78 clock speed, the Realme 13+’s architecture should translate to slightly better sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. The additional A55 core on the Motorola chip may offer minor multitasking benefits, but the 4nm process gives the Realme the edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. The Realme 13+’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 80W wired charging (50% in 19 minutes) is significantly faster than the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes). This means the Realme 13+ can recover from a depleted battery much quicker. While the Edge 40 Neo offers superior longevity on a single charge, the Realme 13+’s charging speed mitigates the inconvenience of frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 13+ if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and want a phone that can quickly recover from heavy use. This is ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more refined, balanced experience. This phone is perfect for users who don't want to worry about constantly reaching for a charger.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 Energy in the Realme 13+ get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, it should be better managed compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, potentially leading to less throttling and more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Realme 13+ compared to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo in real-world use?
Both phones reach 50% charge relatively quickly, but the Realme 13+’s 80W charging (19 minutes to 50%) offers a noticeable advantage for a full charge. While the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W (15 minutes to 50%) is still fast, the Realme will likely complete a 0-100% charge in significantly less time, making it ideal for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Is the Motorola Edge 40 Neo a good choice for users who frequently travel and have limited access to power outlets?
Absolutely. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s exceptional battery life (10:28h active use) makes it an excellent companion for travelers. The ability to go a full day, or even longer, on a single charge reduces the reliance on finding power outlets, providing peace of mind during trips.
