The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme 13 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for users seeking performance without a flagship price tag. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, focusing on the key differences in chipset architecture, display capabilities, and charging speeds to determine which device delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Realme 13’s Dimensity 6300, coupled with faster 67W charging and a brighter display. While the Realme 13 offers a more affordable entry point, the X6 Pro justifies its price with superior capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 06 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 580 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
other unspecified camera | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Green, Dark Purple | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | RMX3951 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 14,599 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme 13
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 45W fast charging is still respectable
- Dimensity 6300 chipset is less powerful than the X6 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than the X6 Pro
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Bright 1148 nit display
- Faster 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Higher price compared to the Realme 13
- Battery life, while good, isn't exceptional
- Software experience can be Xiaomi's MIUI, which some users dislike
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Realme 13. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology details for the Realme 13 are missing, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the X6 Pro’s superior brightness is a key differentiator for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s marketing often emphasizes its camera capabilities, suggesting a more robust imaging system. Without sensor size or aperture information for either phone, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume the X6 Pro will likely offer more advanced image processing features and potentially better low-light performance, given its positioning as a performance-focused device. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme 13 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the Poco X6 Pro features the more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm). The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is a substantial upgrade over the Realme 13’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also offers improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother gaming and faster app loading times on the Poco X6 Pro.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Realme 13’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s endurance is impressive. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Realme 13’s 45W charging, which only reaches 50% in 30 minutes. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 13 if you prioritize affordability and a balanced everyday experience. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and engage in light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand more processing power for demanding games, multitasking, or content creation, and value faster charging and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which is more efficient than the 6nm process used in the Realme 13’s Dimensity 6300. This improved efficiency helps to mitigate heat generation. While some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro is likely to experience less throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods compared to the Realme 13.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro compare to the 45W charging on the Realme 13 in real-world use?
The Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging is significantly faster. It can fully charge the device in 45 minutes, while the Realme 13 only reaches 50% charge in the same timeframe. This means you can get a substantial charge in a shorter amount of time with the X6 Pro, making it more convenient for users who are always on the go.
❓ Is the Realme 13 a good option for playing graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Realme 13 can run these games, the Dimensity 6300 chipset will likely require lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Poco X6 Pro, with its Dimensity 8300 Ultra, will provide a smoother and more visually rich gaming experience at higher settings.
