Realme 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the Realme 13 Pro+ is the better choice. Its 13:39 active use score surpasses the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer for those who value speed above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 13 Pro+ | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 30 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 06 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 or 8.4 mm | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 73mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 19 min, 100% in 49 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Monet Gold, Emerald Green, Monet Purple | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | RMX3920, RMX3921 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | $ 549.00 / ₹ 24,999 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme 13 Pro+
- Longer battery life (13:39h active use)
- Brighter display (1398 nits)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to chipset efficiency
- Less powerful chipset than the Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Slower charging speed (80W wired)
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Significantly faster charging (120W wired, 50W wireless)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 9300+)
- Superior processing power for gaming and photography
- Shorter battery life (12:32h active use)
- Lower peak display brightness (1228 nits)
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize a 4nm process, but their display characteristics differ. The Realme 13 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 1398 nits, significantly outshining the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the Realme’s higher brightness suggests a potentially more advanced panel generation. We lack PWM frequency data, but brightness is a clear win for the Realme. Bezels are assumed to be similar given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Xiaomi 14T Pro has more processing power available for computational photography. The Dimensity 9300+’s ISP is likely more advanced, enabling features like better low-light performance and faster image processing. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera systems, but the Xiaomi’s superior processing capabilities give it an edge in image quality. The Realme’s camera performance will likely be good, but the Xiaomi has the potential to be exceptional.
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ is the clear performance leader on paper. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, dwarfs the Realme 13 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (2.40 GHz Cortex-A78). The Dimensity’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds will result in noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. However, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s efficiency could lead to better sustained performance under heavy load, mitigating thermal throttling. The Xiaomi’s use of Cortex-X4 cores is a significant architectural advantage.
Battery Life
The Realme 13 Pro+ delivers a longer active use battery life of 13:39h compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h. This difference, while not massive, is significant for users who prioritize all-day endurance. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro compensates with its incredibly fast 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Realme’s 80W charging, while still fast (49 minutes to full), pales in comparison. The Xiaomi also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Realme.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 13 Pro+ if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day on a single charge and offers a smooth, consistent experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize blazing-fast charging, demanding mobile gaming, and are willing to trade some battery life for peak performance and the latest chipset architecture.