The Realme 13 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F5 Pro, leveraging the older but still potent Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, aims for near-flagship performance at a more accessible price. The Realme 13 Pro, with its newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, focuses on efficiency and a balanced experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly higher performance, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Realme 13 Pro offers respectable efficiency, the Poco F5 Pro’s faster charging and comparable battery life make it a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 30 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 06 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 or 8.4 mm | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g or 188 g (6.49 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Monet Gold, Emerald Green, Monet Purple | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3990 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | $ 499.00 / ₹ 18,500 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 13 Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially longer software support
- Efficient power consumption
- Lower peak performance compared to Poco F5 Pro
- Slower charging speed
- Limited display information
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster 67W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Older chipset architecture
- Potentially less efficient power consumption
- May receive fewer software updates
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Realme 13 Pro (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. While the Realme 13 Pro’s display specifications are currently limited, the Poco F5 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard refresh rate, impacting power consumption during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the Realme 13 Pro. The Poco F5 Pro’s camera system likely benefits from the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s superior image signal processor (ISP). Without sensor size or aperture information for the Realme 13 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests potential limitations in video stabilization. The focus should be on real-world image samples to determine the actual camera performance of both phones.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Realme 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the 7s Gen 2’s 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 8+ Gen 1’s architecture provides a substantial advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and GPU performance, making the Poco F5 Pro the clear winner for gamers and power users. While both are built on a 4nm process, the architectural differences translate to a noticeable performance gap.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing charging speeds. However, the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) is significantly faster than the Realme 13 Pro’s 45W charging (50% in 27 minutes). The Poco F5 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes), a feature absent in the Realme 13 Pro. While both offer comparable endurance, the Poco F5 Pro’s faster wired and wireless charging provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 13 Pro if you prioritize a newer chipset for potentially longer software support and are content with solid, everyday performance. It’s a good fit for users who value efficiency and don’t heavily rely on mobile gaming or resource-intensive applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand raw power for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial performance advantage, and the 67W charging is a significant convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for being well-managed thermally, especially compared to the original Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. While it can get warm, the Poco F5 Pro’s cooling system (details unavailable) should prevent significant throttling during typical gaming sessions. However, sustained, high-graphics settings may still lead to some performance reduction over extended periods.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Realme 13 Pro compare to the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro is noticeably faster. While both phones reach 50% charge in a reasonable timeframe, the Poco F5 Pro will achieve a full charge significantly quicker. This is a considerable convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and email, the difference will be minimal. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these workloads smoothly. However, when multitasking with numerous apps or performing more demanding tasks like video editing, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro will exhibit a clear performance advantage.
