The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme 13 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo are two strong contenders vying for your attention. The Realme 13 Pro leverages Qualcomm’s efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 7030. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Realme 13 Pro’s 45W, and the 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance. However, the Realme 13 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those focused on a newer chipset architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 30 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 06 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 or 8.4 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g or 188 g (6.49 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 27 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Monet Gold, Emerald Green, Monet Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3990 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 499.00 / ₹ 18,500 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 13 Pro
- More modern 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Higher clocked CPU cores
- Slower 45W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Unknown battery endurance
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Older 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potentially less efficient chipset
- CPU core configuration may not be optimal for all tasks
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for users who frequently use their phones outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Realme 13 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, Motorola’s panel offers superior visibility. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness also suggests a potentially wider color gamut and better HDR performance, though this requires further testing. We expect both phones to utilize OLED panels, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness gives it a clear edge.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of sensor information for both devices. However, the presence of 'Photo / Video' capabilities on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo suggests a focus on versatile camera performance. The absence of specific sensor details necessitates caution; a larger sensor size generally translates to better low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume both phones will include a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will vary significantly based on sensor size and image processing algorithms. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution 2MP macro cameras on both devices, the primary sensor and its accompanying OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will be the key differentiators.
Performance
The Realme 13 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a smaller 4nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030. However, the Dimensity 7030 features a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), potentially offering a marginal advantage in single-core tasks. The Realme 13 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores are clocked higher, but the Dimensity 7030 has a different core configuration (2x A78 vs 4x A78). Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and sustained load handling.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h is a testament to its excellent endurance, and the 68W wired charging capability is significantly faster than the Realme 13 Pro’s 45W. The Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Realme 13 Pro takes 27 minutes. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the Realme 13 Pro’s chipset may be more power-efficient, the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and longer endurance provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 13 Pro if you need a phone with a more modern chipset architecture (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) and anticipate benefiting from potential future software optimizations. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize exceptional battery life, incredibly fast charging speeds, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Edge 40 Neo is the better choice for users who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day and dislike waiting for it to charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, its 6nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4nm node. This means it *could* generate more heat under sustained load, like extended gaming. However, Motorola’s thermal management implementation will play a crucial role. User reviews and independent testing will be necessary to determine if throttling is a significant issue.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Realme 13 Pro compare to typical fast charging standards?
45W charging is considered a standard fast charging speed in the mid-range segment, but it’s noticeably slower than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W. While 45W will still provide a reasonable top-up, it won’t be as quick as the Edge 40 Neo, taking approximately 27 minutes to reach 50% charge compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 15 minutes.
❓ Is the difference in CPU core configuration (4x A78 on Realme vs 2x A78 on Motorola) significant for everyday tasks?
For most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference in A78 core count is unlikely to be noticeable. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s four A78 cores may offer a slight advantage in heavily multi-threaded applications, but the Dimensity 7030’s higher peak clock speed could compensate in certain scenarios. The overall user experience will be more influenced by software optimization than the raw core count.
