Realme 12+ vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more affordable price, the Realme 12+ emerges as the winner. Its 13:03-hour active use score comfortably surpasses the Edge 50 Pro’s 11:59 hours. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 125W charging and Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset offer a compelling alternative for those who value speed and future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 12+ | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 29 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 02 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 7.9 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pioneer Green, Navigator Beige | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | RMX3867 | XT2403-2 |
| Price | € 192.98 / $ 200.22 / £ 203.26 / ₹ 18,999 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
Realme 12+
- Exceptional battery life (13:03h)
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Edge 50 Pro
- Slower charging speed
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Shorter battery life (11:59h)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature vibrant displays, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 1295 nits compared to the Realme 12+'s 1148 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both are excellent, the Edge 50 Pro’s panel likely benefits from a more advanced manufacturing process, contributing to its superior brightness. We lack information on panel type (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rate, but the brightness difference is a clear advantage for the Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Edge 50 Pro will likely have a more capable image signal processor (ISP) for faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Realme 12+ likely relies on software optimization to compensate for a potentially less powerful ISP. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera system, but the Edge 50 Pro’s chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Realme 12+'s MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Edge 50 Pro’s CPU configuration – a 1x Cortex-A715 prime core alongside 4x Cortex-A715 performance cores and 3x Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – is more modern and generally faster than the Realme’s 2x Cortex-A78 and 6x Cortex-A55 setup. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and multitasking scenarios.
Battery Life
The Realme 12+ delivers a superior 13:03-hour active use battery life, indicating excellent power management and optimization. While the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 11:59 hours is still respectable, it falls short. However, the Edge 50 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 125W wired charging fully charges the device in just 18 minutes, compared to the Realme 12+'s 67W charging which takes 19 minutes to reach 50%. The addition of 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging on the Edge 50 Pro further enhances its convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 12+ if you need exceptional battery endurance for extended use throughout the day, and prioritize value for money. It’s ideal for users who stream videos, browse social media, and make frequent calls without constantly worrying about finding a charger. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer blazing-fast 125W charging, a more efficient 4nm chipset for demanding tasks, and the convenience of wireless charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery life.