The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme 12 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo are two compelling options vying for your attention. The Realme 12 Pro leverages Qualcomm’s efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 7030. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 10:28h active use score and 1073 nits peak brightness provide a tangible advantage. However, the Realme 12 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a slightly newer chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3842 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 219.59 / $ 746.80 / ₹ 24,490 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 12 Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset (4nm)
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Fast 67W charging
- Limited battery life information
- Display brightness data unavailable
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Exceptional battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Faster 50% charge time (15 minutes)
- Older 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Limited camera details available
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Realme 12 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Neo’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel or calibration. The Realme 12 Pro’s display specs are currently limited, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate impossible, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are absent, hindering a detailed analysis. The Realme 12 Pro’s camera specifications are also missing. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera setups, but the absence of key specs prevents a meaningful comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact overall image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) features a 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 core configuration, potentially offering a slight edge in single-core performance compared to the Realme 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) with its 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. However, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 benefits from a more efficient 4nm process, potentially leading to better thermal management during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 7030’s 6nm node, while still efficient, may exhibit more throttling under prolonged gaming. The Realme 12 Pro’s architecture is newer, suggesting potential for longer software support.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. This is a substantial advantage over any estimated endurance for the Realme 12 Pro, for which no battery life data is available. While both phones support fast 67W/68W wired charging (Realme 12 Pro: 50% in 19 min, Motorola Edge 40 Neo: 50% in 15 min), the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging speed and superior battery life make it the clear winner in this category. The Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h further reinforces its battery prowess.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 12 Pro if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) offers a modern foundation for future software updates. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value exceptional battery endurance, a vibrant and bright display, and a proven track record of efficient power management. It’s the better choice for heavy users and those who frequently consume media outdoors.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, its 6nm process may lead to more noticeable thermal throttling during prolonged gaming compared to the Realme 12 Pro’s 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. However, Motorola’s thermal management solutions likely mitigate this to some extent, and typical gaming sessions shouldn’t pose a significant issue.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro compare to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo in real-world usage?
Although the wattage difference is minimal, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo charges slightly faster, reaching 50% in 15 minutes versus 19 minutes for the Realme 12 Pro. This difference, while not massive, can be noticeable for users who frequently need a quick top-up.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs for both phones a significant drawback for photography enthusiasts?
Yes, the absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS information makes it difficult to assess the camera capabilities of both devices. Photography enthusiasts should seek out independent reviews with detailed camera samples before making a decision.
