Realme 11 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and battery endurance, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset and impressive 10:28 hour active use battery life provide a smoother, longer-lasting experience, despite the Realme 11's slightly faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 11 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 31 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 0-50% in 17 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black (Glory Black), Sunrise Gold (Glory Gold) | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3780 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 11
- Faster charging speed (67W)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor than the Edge 40 Neo
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially shorter battery life
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Faster 50% charge time (15 minutes)
- Potentially higher price
- Charging speed is only marginally faster
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and in bright ambient lighting conditions, a crucial factor for many users. While the Realme 11’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this peak brightness. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely offers a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially for media consumption. We lack information on panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED) for either device, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information. Both phones are likely to feature multi-camera systems, but the specifics are unknown. Without sensor size details or image samples, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance. However, the presence of 'Photo / Video' listed for the Edge 40 Neo suggests a more comprehensive camera feature set. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Edge 40 Neo’s chipset may offer more advanced image processing capabilities. The Realme 11’s camera performance will likely be adequate for social media sharing, but the Edge 40 Neo has the potential for higher-quality images and videos.
Performance
Both devices utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a performance edge over the Realme 11’s Dimensity 6100+. The 7030 features a faster CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the 11’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – resulting in quicker application loading times and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural improvements in the A78 cores provide a noticeable boost. The Edge 40 Neo is better suited for demanding games and resource-intensive applications. The Realme 11 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but may exhibit more lag under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an impressive 10:28 hours of active use. This is a significant improvement over what we might expect from a similarly priced device. While the Realme 11’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours further reinforces its superior battery performance. Both phones offer fast charging – 68W for the Edge 40 Neo and 67W for the Realme 11 – with the Edge 40 Neo reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes, slightly faster than the Realme 11’s 17 minutes. However, the longer runtime of the Edge 40 Neo mitigates the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 11 if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are frequently topping up your battery throughout the day. It’s a good fit for users who value quick bursts of power over extended runtime. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more balanced experience with a brighter, more visible display, longer battery life for all-day use, and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks and gaming.