The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders are battling for your attention: the Realme 11 Pro+ and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and brighter display. While the Realme 11 Pro+ boasts impressive battery life and 100W charging, the Poco's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3740, RMX3741 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 11 Pro+
- Excellent battery life
- Fast 100W charging
- Vibrant display
- Stylish design
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Camera performance potentially lags behind
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Brighter display
- Fast charging (wired & wireless)
- Excellent value
- Slightly lower battery endurance
- Design may be less premium
- Wireless charging can be slower
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a clear winner. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro+'s 793 nits, resulting in significantly better outdoor visibility. The Poco also touts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, but the Poco's brightness advantage is undeniable.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. However, the Poco F5 Pro often benefits from Qualcomm's superior image processing capabilities. The Realme 11 Pro+ is expected to have a high-resolution main sensor (likely 108MP), potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. Ultimately, camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 Pro absolutely dominates. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a flagship-level processor, offering significantly faster performance than the Realme 11 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the Poco F5 Pro. The Dimensity 7050 is still capable, but it's in a different league.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+ holds a slight edge in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 112 hours compared to the Poco F5 Pro's 99 hours. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ compensates with its incredibly fast 100W wired charging, allowing it to quickly top up the battery. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, which are still respectable but not as fast as the Realme.
Buying Guide
The Realme 11 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing battery life, fast charging, and a large, vibrant display for media consumption. The Poco F5 Pro is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and a stunning display, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F5 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, which offers superior performance and graphics capabilities.
❓ Does the Realme 11 Pro+ have faster charging?
Yes, the Realme 11 Pro+ boasts 100W wired charging, which is faster than the Poco F5 Pro's 67W wired charging. However, the Poco offers wireless charging as well.
