The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders are battling for your attention: the Realme 11 Pro+ and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 edges out the Realme 11 Pro+ thanks to its superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. While the Realme boasts impressive battery endurance, the Poco's performance and overall value make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | RMX3740, RMX3741 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Realme 11 Pro+
- Exceptional battery life
- Stylish design
- Fast 100W charging
- Good display brightness
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F5
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 67W charging
- Excellent value for money
- Design might be less premium than Realme
- Battery life slightly less than Realme
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro+'s 793 nits. The Poco's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. Both offer smooth visuals, but the Poco's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. Initial impressions suggest the Poco F5 might have a slight edge in dynamic range and color accuracy, but both should deliver good results in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance will likely be comparable.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 shines. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Dimensity 7050. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the Poco F5. The Cortex-X2 core in the Poco's CPU is a key differentiator.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts an impressive endurance rating of 112 hours, slightly surpassing the Poco F5's 118h (active use score of 11:52h). However, the Poco F5's 67W charging is considerably faster, fully charging in just 46 minutes, compared to the Realme's 100W (though the difference in real-world charging time might not be as significant).
Buying Guide
The Realme 11 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a refined design. The Poco F5 is perfect for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and a vibrant display without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is the clear winner for gaming due to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset.
❓ Does the Realme 11 Pro+ have wireless charging?
No, the Realme 11 Pro+ does not support wireless charging.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Xiaomi generally offers good software support, but Realme's commitment is improving. It's a close call, and depends on individual preferences for MIUI vs. Realme UI.
