The Realme 11 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The Realme 11 Pro focuses on a balance of features and battery life, while the Poco F5 Pro prioritizes raw processing power with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, crucial for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Realme 11 Pro boasts respectable battery life, the Poco F5 Pro’s faster charging and overall efficiency make it the more versatile choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.8 mm | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3771 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | € 294.90 / ₹ 21,999 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme 11 Pro
- Excellent battery endurance (112h)
- Competitive price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Dimensity 7050 chipset is outperformed by Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Significantly brighter display (1059 nits)
- Faster wired and wireless charging options
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro’s display is a clear winner, boasting a peak brightness of 1059 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro’s 790 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both feature similar panel types, the higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio of the Poco F5 Pro provide a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Bezels appear comparable, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator for users who frequently consume content on the go.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable photo and video recording, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Assuming similar sensor sizes, the image processing algorithms will be the deciding factor. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Poco F5 Pro is likely more advanced, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. Without specific details on sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to declare a definitive winner, but the Poco F5 Pro’s processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Realme 11 Pro’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, delivers superior single-core performance, while its more efficient 4nm process contributes to better thermal management. The Dimensity 7050 is no slouch, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a noticeable advantage in graphically intensive applications and sustained workloads. The Poco F5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances its performance capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro’s active use score of 13:14h and endurance rating of 112h suggest excellent battery life. However, the Poco F5 Pro, despite a lower endurance rating of 99h, compensates with significantly faster charging. Both support 67W wired charging, but the Poco F5 Pro adds 30W wireless charging and supports PD3.0/QC3+ for faster wired top-ups (50% in 15 minutes). This combination of charging speeds and wireless capability makes the Poco F5 Pro more convenient for users who frequently need to recharge quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 11 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the convenience of faster wired and wireless charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its improved thermal efficiency compared to earlier Snapdragon generations. While some throttling is inevitable under sustained load, the Poco F5 Pro’s cooling system is generally effective at mitigating overheating, allowing for prolonged gaming sessions with minimal performance drops.
❓ How does the 67W charging on both phones compare in real-world usage?
While both phones support 67W wired charging, the Poco F5 Pro’s support for PD3.0 and QC3+ allows for potentially faster charging speeds with compatible chargers. Furthermore, the addition of 30W wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro provides a convenient alternative for topping up the battery without cables.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference between the Dimensity 7050 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will be minimal. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking or switching between demanding applications.
❓ What kind of storage does the Poco F5 Pro use, and is it expandable?
The Poco F5 Pro utilizes UFS 3.1 storage, which is fast and reliable. Unfortunately, it does *not* offer expandable storage via microSD card, so choosing the appropriate storage configuration at purchase is crucial.
