Realme 11 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme 11 Pro emerges as the slightly better value. Its significantly longer battery life – boasting a 13:14 active use score versus the Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28 – makes it ideal for power users. While the Motorola offers a brighter display, the Realme’s endurance is a more impactful daily benefit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme 11 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 15 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.8 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3771 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 294.90 / ₹ 21,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme 11 Pro
- Exceptional battery life for all-day use
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed
- Potentially more efficient power management
- Lower peak display brightness
- Camera specs are unknown, potentially lagging behind
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Very bright and vibrant display
- Fast 68W charging with a 50% charge in 15 minutes
- Sleek design and potentially lighter build
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Marginally slower CPU clock speed
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro’s 790 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. However, brightness isn’t everything. While both utilize AMOLED panels, the Realme 11 Pro’s panel characteristics (not specified in the data, but typical for Realme) likely prioritize color accuracy and power efficiency. The higher peak brightness of the Motorola is beneficial for HDR content, but the Realme’s lower peak may contribute to its better battery performance. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and without specific color gamut data, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy differences.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the provided data doesn’t allow for a detailed comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s impossible to determine which phone has the superior camera system. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely irrelevant; image quality from these sensors is typically poor. Focusing on the main sensor and image processing algorithms would be key to differentiating the camera performance, but that information is unavailable. We can assume both phones will offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions.
Performance
Both phones are powered by 6nm MediaTek Dimensity chips, but the Realme 11 Pro features the Dimensity 7050, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo uses the Dimensity 7030. The 7050 has a slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz) on its prime Cortex-A78 core, suggesting a marginal performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the real-world difference will likely be minimal. Both chips are paired with similar memory configurations (assumed LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 based on market segment), and thermal management will be crucial. Without thermal testing data, it’s difficult to predict which phone will sustain peak performance for longer periods. The GPU performance is also expected to be very close.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro clearly wins in battery endurance. Its active use score of 13:14 hours significantly surpasses the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28 hours. The older 'Endurance Rating' further reinforces this, with 112 hours for the Realme versus 80 hours for the Motorola. While the Motorola offers 68W charging, claiming a 50% charge in 15 minutes, the Realme’s 67W charging is also very fast. The larger battery capacity (not specified, but likely around 5000mAh for the Realme based on its endurance) combined with potentially more efficient software optimization gives the Realme a substantial advantage in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme 11 Pro if you need all-day battery life and prioritize sustained usage over peak brightness. This phone is perfect for travelers, commuters, or anyone who frequently uses their phone for extended periods. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a vibrant, exceptionally bright display for media consumption and are comfortable with more frequent charging. It’s a strong choice for users who prioritize visual experience and aesthetics.