The Qtek 2020i and i-mate JAMA 101 represent pivotal moments in the early evolution of Windows Mobile smartphones. Both aimed to deliver a pocketable computing experience, but they took different approaches to processing power. This comparison dissects the architectural differences between the Intel Bulverde and Samsung SC3 processors to determine which device offered a more responsive and capable user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking the most responsive experience in early Windows Mobile, the Qtek 2020i emerges as the winner. Its Intel Bulverde 520 MHz processor provides a significant performance advantage over the i-mate JAMA 101’s 300 MHz Samsung SC3, translating to faster application loading and smoother multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | Class 10 | Class 10 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2004, Q2 | 2007, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Cancelled |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 130 x 70 x 18 mm, 105 cc (5.12 x 2.76 x 0.71 in) | 105 x 52.5 x 15.5 mm (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 110 g (3.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~114 ppi density) | 320 x 240 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.5 inches, 53 x 71 mm, 37.9 cm2 (~41.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~32.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors |
| | 5-way navigation button
Downloadable logos | Handwriting recognition
4-way navigation pad |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Intel Bulverde 520 MHz | SAMSUNG SC3 2442X 300MHz |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 2003 SE PocketPC | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | SDIO/MMC | microSD |
| Internal | 128MB RAM, 128MB ROM | 64MB RAM, 128MB ROM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.3 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 1.2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | Proprietary | miniUSB 1.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11b | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) |
| | Microsoft ActiveSync
MP3 player
Predictive text input | Pocket Office
Voice memo
MP3/AAC/AAC+/WMA/OGG/AMR player
WMV/MP4 player
File manager |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 168 h | Up to 150 h |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h | Up to 4 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1300 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1020 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver | Black |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Qtek 2020i
- Faster Intel Bulverde 520 MHz processor for superior performance.
- Potentially better responsiveness in Windows Mobile interface.
- Likely smoother multitasking capabilities.
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher processor clock speed.
- Higher power consumption.
i-mate JAMA 101
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower processor clock speed.
- Lower power consumption.
- Likely more affordable at the time of release.
- Slower Samsung SC3 300 MHz processor.
- Reduced performance in demanding applications.
- Less responsive user interface.
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, size, panel type) is unavailable. However, given the era, both devices likely utilized resistive touchscreen LCDs. The focus here is on processing power impacting UI responsiveness, rather than display fidelity. The faster processor in the Qtek 2020i would have been crucial in rendering the Windows Mobile interface smoothly, regardless of the display's inherent limitations.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided. Given the era, both devices likely featured low-resolution cameras primarily for basic photo capture. The processor’s role in image processing would have been limited by the sensor quality and resolution. The Qtek 2020i’s faster processor *could* have marginally improved image processing speed, but the impact would be minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPUs. The Qtek 2020i boasts an Intel Bulverde 520 MHz processor, while the i-mate JAMA 101 utilizes a SAMSUNG SC3 2442X 300 MHz chip. This 73% clock speed advantage for the Qtek is substantial. Bulverde, being an Intel XScale processor, benefits from Intel’s established architecture and optimization. The SC3, while a capable ARM-based processor, operates at a lower frequency. This translates directly to faster application launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more fluid user experience on the Qtek 2020i. The lack of information on RAM size prevents a complete assessment, but the CPU difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is unavailable for either device. However, the lower clock speed of the Samsung SC3 in the i-mate JAMA 101 suggests potentially better battery life. Lower clock speeds generally equate to reduced power consumption. The Qtek 2020i’s more powerful processor would likely draw more power, resulting in shorter battery life under similar usage conditions. Without specific mAh figures, this remains an educated assumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Qtek 2020i if you prioritize performance and responsiveness for running early Windows Mobile applications and potentially emulating older software. Its faster processor will be noticeable in everyday tasks. Buy the i-mate JAMA 101 if battery life is paramount and your usage is limited to basic communication and simple applications; the lower clock speed of the SC3 processor likely contributes to reduced power consumption, though specific battery capacities are unknown.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Qtek 2020i run older Windows applications more smoothly?
Yes, the Intel Bulverde 520 MHz processor in the Qtek 2020i provides a significant performance advantage over the Samsung SC3 in the i-mate JAMA 101. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother execution of older Windows applications designed for Pocket PC or Windows Mobile.
❓ Is the performance difference between these two phones noticeable for basic tasks like calling and texting?
For basic tasks like calling and texting, the performance difference may be minimal. However, when launching applications, browsing the web, or multitasking, the Qtek 2020i’s faster processor will provide a noticeably more responsive experience. The i-mate JAMA 101 may exhibit lag or slowdowns during these more demanding operations.
❓ Could the i-mate JAMA 101’s battery life offset the performance difference for a typical user?
Potentially. If a user primarily needs a device for basic communication and prioritizes long battery life, the i-mate JAMA 101’s lower-powered processor *could* offer a benefit. However, the performance trade-off is significant, and the Qtek 2020i remains the better choice for users who value responsiveness and multitasking.
