Released in a similar era of budget-focused Android devices, the Gionee Elife S5.1 and QMobile J7 Pro represent attempts to balance affordability with functionality. While both utilize Mediatek chipsets and target the entry-level market, their internal specifications diverge significantly, particularly in processing power. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance or longevity.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a smoother, more responsive experience, the Gionee Elife S5.1 is the better choice. Its octa-core MT6592 processor, clocked at 1.7 GHz, provides a substantial performance advantage over the QMobile J7 Pro’s quad-core MT6737T. However, both phones offer similar battery endurance, making the S5.1 a worthwhile upgrade if within budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 3, 5, 40, 41 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2017, May. Released 2017, May | 2014, September. Released 2014, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 154 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm (6.06 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 139.8 x 67.4 x 5.2 mm (5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 97.7 g (3.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~306 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.8 inches, 63.5 cm2 (~67.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6737T (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6592 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720 | Mali-450MP4 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat), Amigo OS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3150 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2050 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Blue | Black, White, Pink, Mint Green |
| Price | About 18000 INR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -91.2dB / Crosstalk -82.7dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 55h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 2.812 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 64dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 66dB |
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 546Basemark X: 4150 |
QMobile J7 Pro
- Faster Octa-Core Processor
- Better Multitasking Performance
- Comparable Battery Life
- Camera details are unknown
- Display specs are limited
Gionee Elife S5.1
- Affordable Price Point
- Decent Battery Endurance
- Functional Display
- Slower Quad-Core Processor
- Limited Multitasking Capabilities
- Potentially sluggish performance
Display Comparison
Both the Gionee Elife S5.1 and QMobile J7 Pro share a similar display profile, boasting an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio and a 2.812 contrast ratio under sunlight. This suggests both screens prioritize visibility in bright conditions. However, specific details like screen resolution, pixel density, and panel technology (IPS vs. TFT) are missing. Given the era, it's likely both utilize TFT panels. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner; the display experience will likely be comparable, leaning towards functional rather than visually stunning.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing features. In this era, camera performance in this price bracket was generally underwhelming. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature basic cameras suitable for casual snapshots. Without more information, it’s impossible to assess image quality or low-light performance. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera capabilities as a key selling point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Gionee Elife S5.1’s Mediatek MT6592, featuring an octa-core Cortex-A7 processor clocked at 1.7 GHz, significantly outperforms the QMobile J7 Pro’s Mediatek MT6737T with its quad-core Cortex-A53 processor at 1.4 GHz. The A7 architecture, while older, benefits from having twice the cores, resulting in superior multitasking capabilities and faster app loading times. While both are built on a 28nm process, the sheer number of cores gives the S5.1 a clear advantage. Users will notice this difference in everyday tasks and when running multiple applications simultaneously. The J7 Pro will likely struggle with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Gionee Elife S5.1 and QMobile J7 Pro share an endurance rating of 55 hours. This suggests comparable battery life despite the S5.1’s more powerful processor. The 28nm manufacturing process of both chipsets likely contributes to reasonable power efficiency. However, the S5.1’s faster processing could lead to slightly faster battery drain under heavy load. The identical endurance rating indicates that, for typical usage, users can expect similar all-day battery performance from both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the QMobile J7 Pro if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are constrained by a very tight budget. Buy the Gionee Elife S5.1 if you prefer a more fluid user experience, anticipate multitasking, or occasionally play less demanding mobile games. The S5.1’s superior processing power justifies the potential price difference for users who value responsiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6592 in the Gionee Elife S5.1 capable of running modern apps?
While the MT6592 is an older chipset, it's capable of running many modern apps, especially those optimized for lower-end hardware. However, demanding games or resource-intensive applications may experience lag or reduced performance. It's best suited for everyday tasks and lighter app usage.
❓ Will the QMobile J7 Pro struggle with multitasking?
Yes, the QMobile J7 Pro’s quad-core MT6737T processor and limited RAM (spec not provided, but likely 1-2GB) will likely struggle with heavy multitasking. Switching between multiple apps may result in noticeable slowdowns and app reloads. It's best to keep only a few apps open at a time.
❓ How does the battery life of the Gionee Elife S5.1 hold up with its more powerful processor?
Despite the more powerful processor, the Gionee Elife S5.1 maintains a comparable 55-hour endurance rating to the QMobile J7 Pro. This suggests efficient power management and a reasonably sized battery. However, heavy gaming or prolonged video streaming will naturally reduce battery life faster on the S5.1.
