Posh Micro X S240 vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: A Tale of Two Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, feature-rich experience and exceptional camera capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Posh Micro X S240 offers a functional Android experience at a fraction of the cost, making it ideal for basic communication and light tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Posh Micro X S240 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - S240A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - S240B | 1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, July | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 89.8 x 47.8 x 11.7 mm (3.54 x 1.88 x 0.46 in) | 163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 52.7 g (1.87 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 240 x 432 pixels (~202 ppi density) | 1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.45 inches, 16.4 cm2 (~38.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Single | 2 MP | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 1 MP | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h (2G) / Up to 180 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 650 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Phantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition |
| Models | - | SM-S918B, SM-S918B/DS, SM-S918U, SM-S918U1, SM-S918W, SM-S918N, SM-S9180, SM-S918E, SM-S918E/DS |
| Price | - | € 549.90 / $ 454.99 / £ 433.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 126h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1241531 (v9) GeekBench: 4927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Posh Micro X S240
- Extremely affordable price
- Functional Android experience
- Lightweight and portable
- Poor performance for demanding tasks
- Low-quality camera
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- High-quality camera system
- Long battery life and fast charging
- High price point
- Large and heavy design
- Potential for software bloat
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra boasts a significantly more advanced display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1274 nits. While the Posh Micro X S240’s display specifications are unavailable, it’s reasonable to assume a considerably lower brightness and likely lacks features like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates found in the S23 Ultra. The S23 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio, while a marketing term, points to superior black levels and overall image quality. The S23 Ultra’s display is geared towards content consumption and outdoor visibility, while the Posh Micro X S240’s will likely be adequate for basic use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the implementation differs drastically. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera system, while details are limited in the provided data, is known for its advanced features and image processing. The Posh Micro X S240’s camera is likely a basic sensor intended for casual snapshots. The S23 Ultra’s superior image signal processor (ISP) and likely larger sensor size will result in significantly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The S23 Ultra’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will also provide sharper images and smoother video recording.
Performance
The performance gap is immense. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship chipset featuring an octa-core CPU with a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.36 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Posh Micro X S240’s Mediatek MT6572 (28nm) dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon offers vastly superior power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. The S23 Ultra will handle demanding games and multitasking with ease, while the Posh Micro X S240 will struggle with anything beyond basic apps. The S23 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, a feature likely absent in the Posh Micro X S240.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra delivers an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours and 13:24 hours of active use. It supports 45W wired charging with PD3.0, achieving 65% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. The Posh Micro X S240’s battery capacity and charging specifications are unknown, but given its lower price point, it’s reasonable to expect a smaller battery and slower charging speeds. The S23 Ultra’s fast charging and efficient chipset contribute to a more convenient and reliable battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Posh Micro X S240 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and basic web browsing, and are willing to compromise on performance and camera quality. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, a professional-grade camera system, and a premium user experience with features like fast charging and a vibrant display.