The smartphone landscape is littered with choices. We're comparing the Posh Micro X S240, a modern budget offering, against the Samsung Galaxy Note10+, a 2019 flagship that still holds appeal. This isn't about raw power; it's about value, usability, and understanding where each phone excels in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing affordability and basic functionality, the Posh Micro X S240 is the more sensible choice. However, the Samsung Galaxy Note10+ remains a compelling option for those who demand a superior display, significantly faster performance, and versatile features like 45W charging and reverse wireless power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - S240A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global, LATAM |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - S240B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - Canada |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, July | 2019, August 07. Released 2019, August 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 89.8 x 47.8 x 11.7 mm (3.54 x 1.88 x 0.46 in) | 162.3 x 77.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 52.7 g (1.87 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Stylus, 42ms latency (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 240 x 432 pixels (~202 ppi density) | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~498 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.45 inches, 16.4 cm2 (~38.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 114.0 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAMAdreno 640 - USA/China |
| OS | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | 200 entries |
| | - | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 2 MP | CIF |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.1, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom
16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video
0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 1 MP | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0 |
| Games | - | Downloadable |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS, MMS |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| | - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support)
ANT+
Bixby natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 45W wired, PD3.0
15W wireless (Qi)
4.5W reverse wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h (2G) / Up to 180 h (3G) | Up to 450 h |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G) | Up to 6 h |
| Type | Li-Po 650 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Aura Glow, Aura White, Aura Black, Aura Blue |
| Models | - | SM-N975F, SM-N975U, SM-N9750, SM-N975U1, SM-N975W, SM-N975N, SM-N975X, SCV45 |
| Price | - | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.19 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -95.1dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 342208 (v7), 438622 (v8)
GeekBench: 10403 (v4.4), 2154 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Posh Micro X S240
- Extremely affordable price point
- Modern Android OS (likely)
- Compact and lightweight (assumed)
- Significantly slower performance
- Inferior display quality (assumed)
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
- Powerful processor for multitasking and gaming
- Excellent display with high brightness and contrast
- Versatile camera system with advanced features
- Higher price point
- Older device – software updates may be limited
- Larger and heavier than most modern phones
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Note10+ boasts a significantly more advanced display experience. While the Posh Micro X S240's display specs are unavailable, the Note10+'s 794 nits of measured peak brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Note10+'s 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical of AMOLED panels) delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Note10+ likely features a higher PWM dimming rate, potentially reducing eye strain compared to a budget panel, though this is speculative without the S240's specs. The Note10+’s larger screen size also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Note10+ is expected to deliver a far superior imaging experience. While specific sensor details for the Posh Micro X S240 are missing, the Note10+ benefits from Samsung's image processing expertise and likely a larger, higher-resolution main sensor. The Note10+’s camera system is designed for versatility, offering features like multiple lenses and advanced shooting modes. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Note10+ further enhances image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The S240 likely relies on software processing to compensate for hardware limitations.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Posh Micro X S240's Mediatek MT6572, a 28nm dual-core 1.0 GHz processor, is vastly outmatched by the Samsung Galaxy Note10+'s Exynos 9825 (or Snapdragon 855 in some regions), both built on a 7nm process. The Note10+'s octa-core CPU, with its mix of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores (or Kryo 485 cores in the US/China variant), delivers significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. The 7nm process node also translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, crucial for sustained performance. The Note10+ is designed for demanding applications, while the S240 is geared towards basic functionality.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Note10+ achieves an impressive 107-hour endurance rating, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the Posh Micro X S240's battery capacity is unknown, the Note10+'s 45W wired charging (with PD3.0 support), 15W wireless charging (Qi), and even 4.5W reverse wireless charging provide a level of convenience and flexibility the S240 likely cannot match. The Note10+'s charging speed allows for a significantly faster return to full power, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Posh Micro X S240 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10+ if you prioritize a premium user experience, demanding performance for multitasking and gaming, a brighter and more vibrant display, and features like fast charging and reverse wireless charging, even at a higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9825 (or Snapdragon 855) in the Note10+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 9825 was known to run warmer than the Snapdragon 855, the Note10+ features a robust cooling system that generally prevents significant throttling during gaming. However, extended, demanding gameplay may still result in some performance reduction over time. The 7nm process node helps mitigate heat compared to the S240's 28nm chip.
❓ Is the Posh Micro X S240 suitable for running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Posh Micro X S240's dual-core processor and limited RAM (specs unavailable) will struggle with heavy multitasking. Running multiple apps simultaneously may result in noticeable lag and slowdowns. It's best suited for running one app at a time.
❓ How does the Note10+'s S Pen add to the user experience?
The S Pen is a unique feature of the Note10+ offering precise input for note-taking, sketching, and navigating the interface. It also enables Air Actions, allowing remote control of certain phone functions. This adds a layer of productivity and creativity not found in the Posh Micro X S240.
❓ Will the Posh Micro X S240 receive regular software updates?
Budget phones like the Posh Micro X S240 typically receive fewer software updates than flagship devices. The frequency and duration of updates are often limited, potentially leaving the device vulnerable to security risks over time.
