The smartphone market is flooded with options, but finding the right balance between price and performance can be tricky. We pit the ultra-budget Posh Micro X S240 against the more mainstream Samsung Galaxy A54 to determine which device delivers the best experience for your money. This comparison focuses on the core differences in processing power, display quality, and battery endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, responsive experience and a vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. Its Exynos 1380 chipset offers significantly superior performance and future-proofing compared to the Posh Micro X S240’s aging Mediatek MT6572. However, the X S240 represents an incredibly affordable entry point for basic smartphone functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - S240A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - S240B | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, July | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 89.8 x 47.8 x 11.7 mm (3.54 x 1.88 x 0.46 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 52.7 g (1.87 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 240 x 432 pixels (~202 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.45 inches, 16.4 cm2 (~38.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 2 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h (2G) / Up to 180 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 650 mAh, removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | - | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Posh Micro X S240
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Lightweight and potentially compact
- Outdated and underpowered processor
- Likely low-quality display
- Poor camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful and efficient Exynos 1380 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display with high contrast
- Excellent battery life and 25W charging
- Higher price compared to the Posh Micro X S240
- May include bloatware (typical of Samsung)
- Potentially larger size and weight
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly more advanced display experience. While the Posh Micro X S240’s display specifications are unavailable, the A54’s measured peak brightness of 980 nits ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio (typical of Samsung’s AMOLED panels) delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of detailed display information for the X S240 suggests a lower-quality LCD panel, likely with lower brightness and contrast, impacting outdoor usability and overall visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. The A54 likely benefits from Samsung’s sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, though details are missing. The Posh Micro X S240’s camera performance is expected to be basic, suitable for casual snapshots but lacking in detail and low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information for the X S240, it’s safe to assume a significant disadvantage compared to the A54.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, features an octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) designed for efficient multitasking and demanding applications. In contrast, the Posh Micro X S240 relies on a Mediatek MT6572, a dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 processor fabricated on a 28nm node. This older architecture and larger process node translate to significantly lower processing power and increased power consumption, resulting in noticeable lag and slower app loading times on the X S240. The A54 will handle modern games and apps with relative ease, while the X S240 will struggle with anything beyond basic tasks.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 demonstrates strong battery endurance, achieving an impressive 11:15h of active use and an endurance rating of 119 hours. The 25W wired charging allows for relatively quick top-ups. The Posh Micro X S240’s battery capacity and charging speed are unknown, but given its less efficient chipset, it’s likely to require more frequent charging. The A54’s superior power efficiency and faster charging provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Posh Micro X S240 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and your budget is extremely limited. It’s a viable option for first-time smartphone users or as a backup device. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prioritize a fluid user experience, enjoy media consumption with a bright and clear display, and want a phone capable of handling modern apps and occasional gaming without significant lag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380 is a relatively efficient chipset. While it can get warm during prolonged gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling thanks to its 5nm fabrication process and Samsung's thermal management solutions. It's designed to maintain consistent performance for extended periods.
❓ How much of a difference will I notice in app loading times between these two phones?
The difference will be very noticeable. The Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 is significantly faster than the Posh Micro X S240’s Mediatek MT6572. Expect apps to load almost instantly on the A54, while the X S240 will experience considerable lag and delays, especially with more demanding applications.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A54 support high refresh rate gaming (90fps or higher) in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A54 can support 90fps in PUBG Mobile, depending on the graphics settings chosen. The Exynos 1380 has sufficient graphical power to deliver a smooth gaming experience at higher frame rates, though you may need to adjust settings for optimal performance.
