Plum Ram 9 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is the clear winner, offering vastly superior performance, camera capabilities, and a unique foldable design. The Plum Ram 9 provides a budget-friendly option, but sacrifices significantly in key areas. It's a value pick for those on a very tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Plum Ram 9 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 78, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 10. Released 2020, April | 2021, August 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 133.4 x 64.4 x 15.8 mm (5.25 x 2.54 x 0.62 in) | Unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.4 x 72.2 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 109 g (3.84 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Flashlight | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~20.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 256K colors | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 660 |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | No |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 480p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 1.3 MP | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Facebook, Whatsapp, Youtube, Google Assist | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired 10W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 1700 mAh, removable | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Black/Orange | Phantom Black, Green, Lavender, Cream, White, Pink, Gray, Thom Browne Edition, Bespoke Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition, Dream White |
| Models | - | SM-F711B, SM-F711N, SM-F711U, SM-F711U1, SM-F711W, SM-F7110 |
| Price | - | € 279.00 / $ 208.04 / £ 215.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 69h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 596866 (v8) | 682223 (v9) GeekBench: 3441 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Plum Ram 9
- Extremely affordable
- Basic smartphone functionality
- Very low performance
- Poor camera quality
- Outdated chipset
- Likely low-resolution display
- Limited features
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
- Foldable design
- Excellent performance
- Great camera
- 5G connectivity
- Vibrant display
- Fast charging
- Expensive
- Foldable screen durability concerns
- Battery life could be better (though endurance rating is high)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G boasts a vibrant, foldable AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 935 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its infinite contrast ratio delivers stunning visuals. The Plum Ram 9 likely features a standard LCD display with significantly lower brightness and contrast, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience. The Z Flip3's foldable design is a major differentiator.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy Z Flip3 5G's camera system offers significantly better image quality, features, and video recording capabilities. While specific details for the Ram 9 are scarce, it's safe to assume it will offer basic camera functionality with limited resolution and features. The Z Flip3's camera is a major selling point.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 5G in the Galaxy Z Flip3 5G provides exceptional performance, handling demanding games and multitasking with ease. Its octa-core CPU and 5nm architecture are far superior to the Plum Ram 9's dual-core MT6572M chipset. The Ram 9 will struggle with even moderate tasks, exhibiting noticeable lag and slowdowns.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have an endurance rating of 69h, suggesting comparable battery life. However, the Z Flip3's more efficient chipset and optimized software likely contribute to better real-world battery performance despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The Z Flip3 also supports faster charging (15W wired, 10W wireless) compared to the Ram 9's likely slower charging.
Buying Guide
The Plum Ram 9 is for users prioritizing affordability above all else, needing basic smartphone functionality and not demanding high performance or advanced features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is for those seeking a stylish, compact foldable phone with excellent performance, a great camera, and 5G connectivity, and are willing to pay a premium.