The Plum Ram 10 LTE and Nokia C210 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Plum relies on the Unisoc T107, while the Nokia leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 662, creating a significant disparity in processing power and potential user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C210 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the Plum Ram 10 LTE’s Unisoc T107, resulting in smoother multitasking and a more responsive user interface. While the Plum may offer slightly better value depending on pricing, the Nokia’s superior processing power justifies the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 26, 41, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 18 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 18 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 133.4 x 64.4 x 15.8 mm (5.25 x 2.54 x 0.62 in) | 159.5 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 109 g (3.84 oz) | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Flashlight | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~20.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 256K colors | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 610 |
| OS | - | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128MB, 48MB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.3 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, built-in antenna | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | - | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1700 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Black/Orange | Gray |
| Price | - | About 190 EUR |
Plum Ram 10 LTE
- Potentially lower price point
- May include features not found on the Nokia (depending on regional variants)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Significantly weaker performance
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Likely lower-quality display
Nokia C210
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 662
- Smoother multitasking and app loading
- More efficient power consumption
- Potentially higher price
- May not include all the same features as the Plum (depending on regional variants)
- Still a budget device with inherent limitations
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Details on the Plum Ram 10 LTE’s display are scarce, but given its price point, it likely utilizes a basic IPS LCD panel. The Nokia C210 also features an IPS LCD, but its larger 6.5-inch size offers more screen real estate. While neither manufacturer specifies peak brightness or color accuracy, the Nokia’s Qualcomm chipset may allow for slightly better image processing, potentially resulting in more vibrant colors. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, consistent with their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a strong suit for either device. Details on the Plum Ram 10 LTE’s camera are limited. The Nokia C210’s camera setup, while not exceptional, is more clearly defined. It typically features a 13MP main sensor, which, while small, is likely to outperform any camera sensor found in the Plum Ram 10 LTE. The inclusion of a depth sensor on the Nokia C210 allows for basic portrait mode effects. Both devices likely include lower-resolution secondary cameras (e.g., 2MP macro) that offer limited practical value. Image processing will be basic on both, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia C210’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is a significant step up from the Plum Ram 10 LTE’s Unisoc T107. The Snapdragon 662 features an octa-core CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) providing a substantial advantage in multi-core performance. The Unisoc T107 is a quad-core processor, making it less capable of handling demanding tasks. This translates to slower app loading times, laggy multitasking, and a less enjoyable overall user experience on the Plum. The 11nm manufacturing process of the Snapdragon 662 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life under load.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While specific battery capacities aren’t provided, both devices likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Nokia C210’s more efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset will likely result in longer battery life during moderate use. Charging speeds are also likely to be slow on both devices, with neither supporting fast charging technologies. Expect several hours to fully charge from 0-100%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Plum Ram 10 LTE if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize absolute affordability above all else. You’ll be sacrificing performance for the lowest possible price. Buy the Nokia C210 if you want a more fluid and responsive experience, even for moderately demanding tasks like browsing with multiple tabs or occasional gaming. The Snapdragon 662 provides a noticeable upgrade in usability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T107 in the Plum Ram 10 LTE struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Unisoc T107 is a very basic processor. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag and slowdowns, especially when multitasking or using the apps for extended periods. The Nokia C210’s Snapdragon 662 will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ Is the Nokia C210 a good option for playing mobile games?
The Nokia C210 can handle some light mobile gaming, but it’s not a gaming phone. The Snapdragon 662 can run less demanding titles at lower settings. However, graphically intensive games will likely experience significant frame rate drops and lag. The Plum Ram 10 LTE is even less suited for gaming.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Plum Ram 10 LTE and the Nokia C210?
Nokia is known for providing a cleaner, near-stock Android experience, which generally translates to faster updates and fewer pre-installed apps (bloatware). Plum’s software experience is likely to be more customized and may include more pre-installed apps. This can impact performance and storage space.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on each device, and can it be expanded?
Details on storage options for the Plum Ram 10 LTE are limited. The Nokia C210 typically comes with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage and supports microSD card expansion, allowing you to add more storage for photos, videos, and apps. This expandability is a significant advantage.
