Philips PH2 vs Samsung Galaxy A40: A Budget Phone Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone? The Philips PH2 and Samsung Galaxy A40 both offer compelling options, but cater to different needs. This comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide which one is right for you.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A40 takes the crown. While the Philips PH2 boasts a modern chipset, the A40's superior display, established brand reputation, and longer software support make it the more well-rounded choice for most users, despite its age.

PHONES
Phone Names Philips PH2 Samsung Galaxy A40
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA2000 1x -
Launch
Announced2021, December 08. Released 2021, December 132019, March 19. Released 2019, April
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions156.2 x 75.3 x 9 mm (6.15 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)144.4 x 69.2 x 7.9 mm (5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight170 g (6.00 oz)140 g (4.94 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~437 ppi density)
Size6.21 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)5.9 inches, 85.5 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Platform
CPUQuad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.77 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.59 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm)Exynos 7904 (14 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8300Mali-G71 MP2
OSAndroid OS, HMS (Huawei Mobile Services)Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP16 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single5 MP-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP25 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 -ANT+
Battery
Charging-15W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3900 mAhLi-Po 3100 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, GoldBlack, White, Blue, Coral
ModelsS702SM-A405F, SM-A405FN, SM-A405FM, SM-A405S
PriceAbout 110 EURAbout 260 EUR
SAR EU-0.49 W/kg (head)     1.34 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -85.9dB
Battery life-Endurance rating 73h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: infinite
Loudspeaker- Voice 66dB / Noise 68dB / Ring 73dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 106388 (v7) GeekBench: 4112 (v4.4) GFXBench: 4.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Philips PH2

  • Modern Chipset (Unisoc T310)
  • Potentially Lower Price
  • Compact Size (likely)

  • Likely LCD Display
  • Unknown Camera Quality
  • Limited Software Support
  • Less Established Brand

Samsung Galaxy A40

  • Super AMOLED Display
  • Established Brand & Support
  • Good Camera Performance
  • Excellent Battery Life

  • Older Chipset (Exynos 7904)
  • May be harder to find new
  • 15W Charging (relatively slow)

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A40's 5.9-inch Super AMOLED display shines with vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a measured 548 nits of brightness. The Philips PH2 likely has an LCD display, which will offer less contrast and potentially lower brightness. The A40's infinite contrast ratio is a significant advantage.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is subjective, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 generally has a better reputation for image processing and overall camera performance. While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the A40 likely has better low-light performance and more refined software features. The PH2's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots.

Performance

The Philips PH2's Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset, while newer at 12nm, features a Cortex-A75 core, which can offer a slight performance boost in single-core tasks. However, the Samsung Galaxy A40's Exynos 7904, with its octa-core design, provides a more balanced performance across multiple tasks. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization.

Battery Life

Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 73 hours. This suggests excellent battery life for both devices, making battery life a non-factor in the comparison.

Buying Guide

The Philips PH2 is ideal for users prioritizing a very budget-friendly device and potentially needing a slightly more modern chipset for basic tasks. The Samsung Galaxy A40 is better suited for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded experience with a good display and camera, even if it's an older model.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Philips PH2 a good phone for gaming?
The Unisoc T310 chipset is adequate for basic games, but don't expect high-end gaming performance. The Samsung Galaxy A40 might offer a slightly smoother experience.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A40 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 2-3 years of software updates for its A-series phones. The PH2's update support is likely to be more limited.