The smartphone market is flooded with options, but finding the right balance between price and performance can be tricky. We're comparing the Philips PH2, a device focused on efficient operation, against the Realme 10 Pro+, which prioritizes speed and features like rapid charging. This comparison will help you determine which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Realme 10 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1080 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Philips PH2's Unisoc Tiger T310, and the 67W charging is a game-changer. However, the PH2 remains a viable option for those seeking a basic, efficient device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 08. Released 2021, December 13 | 2022, November 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, November 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 75.3 x 9 mm (6.15 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 161.5 x 73.9 x 7.8 mm or 8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 173 g / 175 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.21 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android OS, HMS (Huawei Mobile Services) | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 17 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3900 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Dark Matter Black, Nebula Blue, Hyperspace |
| Models | S702 | RMX3687, RMX3686 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 269.00 / ₹ 22,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 149h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 522376 (v9)
GeekBench: 2371 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Philips PH2
- Potentially better power efficiency due to simpler chipset.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Simple and easy-to-use interface.
- Significantly slower performance.
- Lacks fast charging.
- Inferior display quality.
Realme 10 Pro+
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 1080.
- 67W SuperVOOC charging for rapid power-ups.
- Likely superior display quality and camera capabilities.
- Higher price compared to the Philips PH2.
- Potentially shorter battery life due to power-hungry chipset (mitigated by fast charging).
- Realme's ColorOS may not appeal to all users.
Display Comparison
The Realme 10 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a vibrant AMOLED panel, though specific brightness nits are not provided. The Philips PH2's display specifications are absent, implying a standard LCD panel likely with lower contrast and brightness. This difference will be noticeable in direct sunlight, where the Realme 10 Pro+ will offer superior visibility. The Realme's panel is likely to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent from the PH2's likely 60Hz display.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature cameras, the Realme 10 Pro+ is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system. Details are missing for both, but Realme typically focuses on high-resolution sensors. The Philips PH2's camera is likely a basic setup geared towards casual photography. The Realme's image processing capabilities, powered by the Dimensity 1080's ISP, will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. Without specific sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Realme's marketing often emphasizes camera features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 10 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm), an octa-core processor with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration, built on a more advanced 6nm process, delivers significantly higher performance and efficiency compared to the Philips PH2's Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) with its quad-core setup (1x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 1080's superior architecture and core count translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The Realme also benefits from potentially faster RAM (likely LPDDR4X or LPDDR5) compared to the PH2, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Realme 10 Pro+ shines with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 17 minutes (advertised). This is a significant advantage over the Philips PH2, which lacks fast charging capabilities. While the PH2's battery capacity is unknown, the Realme 10 Pro+'s 149-hour endurance rating suggests a substantial battery life, even with its faster charging and more powerful processor. The 67W charging allows for quick top-ups, minimizing downtime, a crucial benefit for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Philips PH2 if you need a reliable, no-frills smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and value long-term efficiency over raw power. Buy the Realme 10 Pro+ if you prefer a smoother experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging and a more feature-rich experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme 10 Pro+’s Dimensity 1080 chipset capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Dimensity 1080 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can handle most popular titles at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps with thermal management, reducing the risk of significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long does it *really* take to charge the Realme 10 Pro+ from 0% to 100% with the 67W charger?
While Realme advertises 50% charge in 17 minutes, a full 0-100% charge typically takes around 45-50 minutes in real-world testing. This is still incredibly fast compared to standard charging speeds and a significant advantage over the Philips PH2.
❓ Does the Philips PH2 support any form of fast charging?
No, the Philips PH2 does not appear to support fast charging based on available specifications. Expect a significantly longer charging time compared to the Realme 10 Pro+, potentially taking several hours to fully charge the device.
❓ What kind of storage does the Realme 10 Pro+ use, and is it expandable?
The Realme 10 Pro+ typically uses UFS 2.2 storage, offering decent read/write speeds. However, it does *not* support microSD card expansion, so you'll need to choose a storage configuration that meets your needs upfront.
