Looking for an affordable and reliable phone? The Philips PH2 and Nokia 1650 are both contenders in the budget phone market, but they cater to different needs. This comparison will help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Philips PH2 offers a slightly more modern chipset and potentially better performance, while the Nokia 1650 leans on Nokia's legendary durability and simplicity. For basic calling and texting, the Nokia wins. For a touch more functionality, the PH2 is the better choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | - |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 08. Released 2021, December 13 | 2007, May. Released 2008, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 75.3 x 9 mm (6.15 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 104.2 x 43.8 x 17.8 mm, 69 cc (4.10 x 1.72 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 80 g (2.82 oz) |
| | - | Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 128 x 160 pixels (~114 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.21 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.8 inches, 35 x 28 mm, 10.2 cm2 (~22.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | CSTN, 65K colors |
| | - | Themes and wallpapers |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | - |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | - |
| OS | Android OS, HMS (Huawei Mobile Services) | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls |
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 8MB |
| Phonebook | - | 500 entries |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Alert types | - | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | No |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | No |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | No |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | No |
| Games | - | Snake Xenzia, Beach Rally, Soccer League |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS(up to 250), EMS, Instant Messaging |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | - |
| | - | Predictive text input
Organizer
Personal budget manager
Voice memo
|
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 420 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 8 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 3900 mAh | Removable Li-Ion 1020 mAh battery (BL-5C) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Metallic Red, Metallic Black |
| Models | S702 | - |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 40 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) |
Philips PH2
- Slightly faster processor
- Potential for basic camera functionality
- Larger display (likely)
- More modern design
- Battery life likely shorter than Nokia 1650
- Unisoc chipset may have limitations
- Build quality potentially less robust than Nokia
Nokia 1650
- Exceptional battery life
- Legendary Nokia durability
- Simple and easy to use
- Very affordable
- Limited functionality
- No camera (likely)
- Small, basic display
- Outdated processor
Display Comparison
The Philips PH2 likely features a larger, color display, offering a more modern viewing experience. The Nokia 1650, being a classic feature phone, will likely have a smaller, monochrome or basic color screen, prioritizing battery efficiency over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The Philips PH2 is expected to have a basic camera, allowing for simple photo capture. The Nokia 1650 likely lacks a camera entirely, focusing on core communication features.
Performance
The Philips PH2's Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset, while entry-level, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia 1650's likely older and less powerful processor. Expect smoother navigation and app loading on the PH2.
Battery Life
The Nokia 1650, known for its exceptional battery life, will likely outperform the Philips PH2 in this area due to its simpler hardware and lack of power-hungry features like a color display and camera.
Buying Guide
The Philips PH2 is ideal for users who want basic smartphone features like a slightly faster processor and potentially a camera, without breaking the bank. The Nokia 1650 is perfect for those prioritizing reliability, long battery life, and a simple, durable device for calls and texts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for calls and texts?
The Nokia 1650 excels at calls and texts due to its long battery life and durable design. It's a reliable communication device.
❓ Can I use apps on the Philips PH2?
The Philips PH2 may support some basic apps, but its performance will be limited compared to smartphones. Don't expect to run demanding applications.
