Oukitel WP56 vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oukitel WP56 emerges as the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance uplift over the Ulefone Armor 9E’s 12nm Helio P90, coupled with significantly improved battery endurance. While the Armor 9E remains a capable device, the WP56 provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP56 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 524 g (1.16 lb) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (128 dB, 3W peak) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 18W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 16000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 153:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP56
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7050.
- Superior battery endurance (153:33h).
- Faster 45W wired charging and 18W reverse charging.
- Potentially higher price point.
- Rugged phone design may be bulky.
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Proven and reliable Helio P90 chipset.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Rugged design for durability.
- Older chipset with lower performance.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Likely shorter battery life.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP56’s newer chipset and overall positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more modern panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The Armor 9E, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will offer variable refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests newer devices like the WP56 are more likely to feature improved image sensors and processing algorithms. While both phones likely include multiple cameras, the WP56’s newer chipset benefits from a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. We can assume both will have a primary camera, but the WP56 is more likely to have a larger sensor for improved image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP56’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) is a significant leap forward from the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Helio P90 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the WP56 will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, also outperform the Armor 9E’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP56 boasts an impressive 153:33h endurance rating, indicating significantly longer battery life than the Armor 9E. While the Armor 9E’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the WP56’s endurance, combined with its more efficient chipset, is a major advantage. Furthermore, the WP56 supports 45W wired charging, allowing for much faster replenishment compared to the Armor 9E’s 18W charging. The WP56 also offers 18W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Armor 9E, enabling it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP56 if you prioritize performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and require exceptional battery life for extended field work. Its faster processor and efficient charging will keep you going longer. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you are on a tighter budget and need a reliable, proven rugged phone for basic communication and navigation, accepting a performance trade-off for a potentially lower price point.