Oukitel WP55 vs. Ulefone Armor 15: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and longevity, the Oukitel WP55 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and exceptional 105:49h battery endurance significantly outperform the Ulefone Armor 15. However, the Armor 15 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers who need basic rugged functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 | Ulefone Armor 15 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE Cat13 300/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2022, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2022, August 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 170.2 x 79.6 x 18.2 mm (6.70 x 3.13 x 0.72 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 346 g (12.20 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Built-in wireless earbuds housed inside the top side of the phone; charging | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~56.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.4μm 13 MP, f/2.4, 106˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0μm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0μm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Meteorite Black, Tech Blue, Sport Red |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55
- Significantly faster processor for smooth performance
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- Faster 33W charging with reverse wired charging
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Potentially higher price point
- Rugged design may add bulk
Ulefone Armor 15
- More affordable price
- Rugged design for durability
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Functional battery life for light usage
- Slower processor and limited performance
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera quality
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP55's higher overall positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and brightness. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display excellence, so expect both to have functional, rather than flagship-level, screens. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to contribute to drop protection.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided beyond the device names. However, given the WP55’s higher-end chipset, it’s reasonable to assume it features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing capabilities. Rugged phones often prioritize practicality over camera quality, but the WP55’s processing power could allow for better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Armor 15 will likely offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but will struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Oukitel WP55’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a modern, octa-core processor featuring two high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, paired with six efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Ulefone Armor 15’s Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12nm). The Helio G35 utilizes four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz – an older, less efficient design. The 6nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7025 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Users who intend to game, edit photos/videos, or multitask heavily will find the WP55 a far more responsive and capable device.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55’s battery endurance of 105:49h is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery life. This is likely due to a combination of a large battery capacity (not specified) and the power efficiency of the Dimensity 7025 chipset. The WP55 also supports 33W wired charging and reverse wired charging, allowing for faster replenishment and the ability to charge other devices. The Ulefone Armor 15, with only 18W wired charging, will take considerably longer to charge. While the Armor 15’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the less efficient Helio G35 chipset will result in significantly shorter battery life compared to the WP55.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if long battery life is paramount. Buy the Ulefone Armor 15 if you prioritize affordability and require a durable device for basic communication, navigation, and occasional photography, accepting compromises in processing speed and battery endurance.