Oukitel WP55 vs Blackview BV9900E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oukitel WP55 emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly more efficient Dimensity 7025 chipset, coupled with exceptional 105:49h battery endurance, provides a smoother, longer-lasting experience. While the Blackview BV9900E offers the convenience of wireless charging, it can't match the WP55's overall performance and efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 | Blackview BV9900E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2020, September 10. Released 2020, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm (6.16 x 3.08 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 273 g (9.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.84 inches, 85.1 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V/CE Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 16 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wired 18W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Silver |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 7025 chipset
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging and reverse charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown
Blackview BV9900E
- Convenient 18W wireless charging
- Rugged design and build quality (typical of Blackview)
- Established brand in the rugged phone market
- Older and less efficient Helio P90 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to WP55
- Slower 15W wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP55's newer chipset, it's reasonable to expect a more modern panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. Blackview's history suggests a focus on durability, potentially at the expense of display quality. Users should research independent display tests for both models to assess viewing angles and color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Dimensity 7025 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The WP55 is likely to handle computational photography tasks more efficiently. The BV9900E's Helio P90, while capable, will be limited by its older ISP. Users should focus on independent camera reviews to assess real-world image quality, as sensor size and lens quality are crucial factors not covered in the provided data.
Performance
The Oukitel WP55's Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) represents a substantial leap forward compared to the Blackview BV9900E's Helio P90 (12nm). The Dimensity 7025 utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering significantly improved single-core and multi-core performance. The 6nm process node also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature a 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the P90's older architecture and larger node size will result in lower overall performance and higher power consumption. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications on the WP55.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55's battery endurance of 105:49h is a standout feature, dwarfing what's typically achievable with the Blackview BV9900E's older chipset. The Dimensity 7025's 6nm efficiency is the primary driver of this advantage. While the BV9900E offers 18W wireless charging, the WP55 compensates with 33W wired charging and reverse wired charging, providing faster top-ups and the ability to charge other devices. The WP55 also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, suggesting greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and future-proofed chipset technology. Buy the Blackview BV9900E if wireless charging is a must-have feature and you primarily engage in less demanding tasks, accepting the trade-off in processing power and battery efficiency.