Oukitel WP55 vs Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and long-term battery health, the Oukitel WP55 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and exceptional 105:49h endurance rating significantly outperform the Blackview BV8800's 199h rating. However, the BV8800's brighter display is a notable advantage for outdoor visibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7025 chipset
- 1000 charge cycles for extended battery health
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Blackview BV8800
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- Faster charging times (100% in 90 minutes)
- Established brand in the rugged phone market
- Significantly lower battery endurance (199h)
- Less powerful and efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Limited camera information
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits and a 1348:1 contrast ratio, providing a more visible and vibrant display, particularly outdoors. While the Oukitel WP55’s display specifications are not provided, the BV8800’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for users who spend significant time in direct sunlight. The identical contrast ratios suggest similar color reproduction quality, but the WP55’s panel technology remains unknown, potentially impacting viewing angles and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. This makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the absence of any mention of advanced features like OIS on either device suggests a focus on basic photography functionality. The lack of detail also implies that the 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant image quality improvements. Without further information, it’s safe to assume the camera performance will be comparable, leaning towards adequate for casual use rather than professional photography.
Performance
The Oukitel WP55’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7025 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering substantially higher single-core performance compared to the BV8800’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 6nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency, contributing to the WP55’s exceptional battery life. While both phones feature a similar Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the WP55’s superior core architecture and manufacturing process provide a clear performance advantage, especially in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55’s endurance rating of 105:49h is a game-changer, dwarfing the Blackview BV8800’s 199h. This massive difference is likely attributable to the Dimensity 7025’s superior power efficiency and potentially a larger battery capacity (though not explicitly stated). While both phones support 33W wired charging, the BV8800 provides more specific charging times: 31% in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. The WP55’s 1000 charge cycles also suggest a focus on long-term battery health, promising sustained performance over years of use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if battery longevity is your absolute top priority. This is ideal for travelers, outdoor workers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a more visually vibrant experience with a brighter screen, and if you value a more established brand within the rugged phone space, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.