Oukitel WP55 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Oukitel WP55 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Helio P90, coupled with significantly better battery endurance, making it ideal for demanding tasks and extended outdoor use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367.6 g (12.98 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (thermal), 1/1.5" | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Gray | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7025.
- Exceptional battery life with 105:49h endurance.
- Faster 33W charging.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- Likely higher price point.
- Rugged design may add bulk.
Ulefone Armor 9E
- More affordable price.
- Rugged design for durability.
- Reliable performance for basic tasks.
- Decent battery life for light usage.
- Older and less efficient Helio P90 chipset.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Limited performance for demanding applications.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP55 Ultra’s focus on modern internals, it’s reasonable to expect a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the Armor 9E. The Armor 9E, utilizing the older Helio P90, likely features a more standard LCD panel. Users prioritizing visual clarity and smoothness will likely find the WP55 Ultra more appealing, assuming it incorporates newer display technology.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a detailed comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the WP55 Ultra will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. The Armor 9E’s older ISP will likely result in less detailed images and slower processing times. It’s safe to assume both phones will include a variety of camera sensors, but the WP55 Ultra’s processing power will likely be the deciding factor in overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12nm). The Dimensity 7025’s newer architecture – featuring 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – provides a substantial performance boost in both CPU and GPU tasks. The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Armor 9E’s Helio P90, while capable, is based on an older 12nm process and its Cortex-A75 cores are less efficient. This means the Armor 9E will likely struggle with demanding games or multitasking compared to the WP55 Ultra.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55 Ultra boasts a remarkable 105:49h endurance rating, a testament to its efficient chipset and optimized power management. While the Armor 9E’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its less efficient Helio P90 chipset will undoubtedly result in significantly shorter battery life. The WP55 Ultra also supports 33W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the Armor 9E’s 18W charging. The 1000 charge cycles claim for the WP55 Ultra also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself, a crucial factor for long-term durability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 Ultra if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding applications like navigation, data logging, or extended media consumption. Its superior processing power and exceptional 105:49h battery endurance make it the better option for professionals and power users. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize a lower price point and only require basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, and light app usage – in a durable package. It’s a suitable choice for those needing a reliable, but not necessarily powerful, rugged device.