Oukitel WP55 Ultra vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and extended battery life, the Oukitel WP55 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and 105:49h endurance significantly outperform the Nokia XR20’s Snapdragon 480 and shorter battery life. However, the XR20 remains a solid choice for those valuing Nokia’s software experience and 5G connectivity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 Ultra | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367.6 g (12.98 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (thermal), 1/1.5" | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Gray | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- Powerful Dimensity 7025 chipset for smooth performance
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Software support may be less frequent than Nokia
- Rugged design may result in a bulkier form factor
Nokia XR20
- Reliable Nokia software and security updates
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging convenience
- Durable build quality
- Slower Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slower 18W wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific display specs are missing, the focus on ruggedness suggests both will prioritize durability over peak visual fidelity. However, the chipset difference hints at potential display capabilities; the Dimensity 7025 in the WP55 Ultra could support a higher refresh rate panel than the XR20’s Snapdragon 480 is capable of driving efficiently. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to contribute to drop protection.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the WP55 Ultra may prioritize megapixel count for marketing appeal, while Nokia typically focuses on image processing and color accuracy. The XR20’s image processing pipeline is likely more refined, offering more natural-looking photos in various conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but the XR20’s brand reputation suggests a more consistent camera experience.
Performance
The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) represents a significant leap in processing power compared to the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The Dimensity 7025’s octa-core configuration, with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offers superior single-core and multi-core performance than the XR20’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 setup. The 6nm process node further enhances efficiency, potentially leading to better thermal management during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the WP55 Ultra, particularly for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s battery endurance of 105:49h is a standout feature, dwarfing what’s typically expected from a smartphone. This is coupled with a 1000 cycle lifespan, promising long-term battery health. While the Nokia XR20 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, its 18W wired charging is significantly slower than the WP55 Ultra’s 33W wired charging. The WP55 Ultra’s larger battery capacity, combined with the more efficient Dimensity 7025 chipset, ensures significantly longer usage between charges, making it ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 Ultra if you need a phone that can withstand demanding tasks and prolonged use without needing frequent charging, and if you prioritize processing power for gaming or productivity. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a more mainstream smartphone experience with guaranteed software updates, reliable 5G connectivity, and a brand known for its commitment to security and longevity, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.