Oukitel WP55 Ultra vs Doogee S96 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the Oukitel WP55 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset, coupled with a remarkable 105:49h battery endurance, significantly outperforms the Doogee S96 Pro’s older Helio G90, making it ideal for extended field work or travel.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 Ultra | Doogee S96 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2020, October 26. Released 2020, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 167 x 81.4 x 15.5 mm (6.57 x 3.20 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367.6 g (12.98 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~71.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/2.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (thermal), 1/1.5" | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 24W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Gray | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 280 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7025 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown
Doogee S96 Pro
- Wireless charging support (10W)
- Established brand in the rugged phone market
- Potentially more visually appealing display
- More readily available accessories
- Older and less efficient Helio G90 chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP55 Ultra’s focus on endurance and the S96 Pro’s positioning, we can infer differences. The S96 Pro likely prioritizes a visually appealing display, potentially with a higher refresh rate, while the WP55 Ultra may opt for a more power-efficient panel to maximize battery life. Rugged phones often sacrifice peak brightness for durability, so expect both to perform adequately in direct sunlight but not compete with flagship displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is impossible. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Dimensity 7025’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely result in better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range compared to the G90. Both phones likely feature multiple cameras, but the WP55 Ultra’s chipset gives it an edge in computational photography. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the WP55 Ultra should deliver superior results in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Doogee S96 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G90 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to superior power efficiency and thermal management. The Dimensity 7025’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer a substantial performance boost over the G90’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the WP55 Ultra. The G90, while capable, will likely exhibit more throttling under sustained load. The WP55 Ultra’s architecture is simply more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55 Ultra dominates in battery endurance with a reported 105:49h runtime. This is a massive advantage over what we’d expect from the Doogee S96 Pro, given its older chipset and smaller battery (spec not provided, but likely in the 5000-6000 mAh range). The WP55 Ultra also boasts 1000 charge cycles, indicating a longer lifespan. While the S96 Pro offers 24W wired and 10W wireless charging, the WP55 Ultra’s 33W wired charging provides a faster top-up, even if it lacks wireless capabilities. The WP55 Ultra’s superior efficiency means you’ll spend less time tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 Ultra if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge and handle demanding tasks without significant throttling. It’s the perfect companion for extended outdoor adventures, construction work, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Doogee S96 Pro if you prioritize the convenience of wireless charging and prefer a brand with a longer track record in the rugged phone market, understanding you’ll trade some processing power and battery life for these features.