Oukitel WP55 Ultra vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Oukitel WP55 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, coupled with a substantially longer battery endurance rating of 105:49h. While the Cat S62 Pro has brand recognition, the WP55 Ultra delivers more for the money.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 Ultra | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367.6 g (12.98 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (thermal), 1/1.5" | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Gray | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7025)
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- Faster charging (33W)
- Likely more modern display technology
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness
- Proven reliability of the Snapdragon 660 platform
- Potentially more readily available accessories
- Familiar software experience (depending on Android version)
- Outdated processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Inferior battery life compared to WP55 Ultra
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely older display technology
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's age (released 2019), it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Oukitel WP55 Ultra, being a newer device, likely benefits from a more modern panel technology, potentially offering improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data suggests neither prioritizes a fluid visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests the Oukitel WP55 Ultra, as a newer device, likely incorporates more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The Cat S62 Pro, while capable, is limited by its older hardware. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many rugged phones is often a marketing gimmick, offering limited real-world benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7025 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance under load. The Dimensity 7025’s octa-core configuration (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a more balanced and powerful CPU architecture compared to the Snapdragon 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Oukitel.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55 Ultra’s battery endurance of 105:49h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically achievable with the Snapdragon 660-powered Cat S62 Pro. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 660’s less efficient 14nm process will inevitably lead to shorter runtimes. The WP55 Ultra’s 33W wired charging is also faster, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s likely slower charging speeds. The 1000 charge cycles claim for the WP55 Ultra also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 Ultra if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks, extended use without charging, and future-proofed performance. It’s ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who frequently finds themselves in harsh environments and relies heavily on their smartphone. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-known brand with a history of rugged devices and are content with moderate performance for basic tasks like communication and navigation. It’s a solid choice for those who value reliability over raw power.