Oukitel WP55 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Oukitel WP55 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant advantage in both processing power and power efficiency compared to the Ulefone Armor 9E’s 12nm Helio P90. The WP55 Pro’s superior battery endurance further solidifies its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP55 Pro | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.3 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/1.78", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP55 Pro
- Superior chipset performance with the Dimensity 7025
- Exceptional battery life (105:49h endurance)
- Faster 33W charging with reverse wired charging
- Potentially better image processing capabilities
- May command a higher price point
- Rugged design may add bulk
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Potentially lower price point
- Proven Helio P90 chipset (reliable, if not cutting-edge)
- Rugged design for durability
- Solid build quality expected from Ulefone
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
- Lower battery endurance compared to WP55 Pro
- Older 12nm process leads to lower efficiency
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the target market, both devices likely feature durable, reinforced displays. However, the chipset difference suggests the WP55 Pro could potentially support a higher refresh rate panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations. The 6nm Dimensity 7025 has more headroom for driving a more demanding display than the 12nm Helio P90. Expect both to prioritize visibility in direct sunlight, a key feature for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, but given the rugged phone segment, image quality is often secondary to durability. However, the processing power of the Dimensity 7025 in the WP55 Pro suggests superior image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The Armor 9E’s Helio P90 will likely struggle with complex image processing algorithms, especially in low-light conditions. Without sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the chipset advantage favors the WP55 Pro.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP55 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Helio P90 (12nm). The 6nm fabrication process allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better sustained performance and less heat generation. While both CPUs feature a similar core configuration (2x high-performance + 6x efficiency cores), the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7025 are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A75 cores in the Helio P90, offering a noticeable performance boost in CPU-bound tasks. This benefits users running mapping applications, complex spreadsheets, or multitasking between several apps.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP55 Pro boasts an impressive 105:49h endurance rating, significantly exceeding what we’d expect from a phone with the Armor 9E’s 18W charging. While the Armor 9E’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed suggests a smaller battery or less efficient power management. The WP55 Pro’s 33W charging is also a significant advantage, allowing for faster top-ups when needed. The 1000 charge cycle claim for the WP55 Pro also indicates a focus on long-term battery health, a crucial factor for users who rely on their phones for extended periods.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP55 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like extended navigation, data-intensive work apps, or moderate gaming, all while benefiting from exceptional battery life. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are primarily focused on basic communication, light usage, and appreciate a proven, if less powerful, chipset.