Oukitel WP52 vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance and battery longevity, the Oukitel WP52 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the Ulefone Armor 9E’s 12nm Helio P90, translating to better sustained performance and a significantly longer battery endurance of 65:13h.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP52 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 17 | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80 x 12 mm (6.78 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 281 g (9.91 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 440 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Blue | Black |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:13h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP52
- Superior chipset efficiency (6nm Dimensity 6100+)
- Exceptional battery endurance (65:13h)
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Display specifications unknown
- Potentially higher price point
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Proven Helio P90 platform
- Potentially lower price point
- Rugged design and build quality
- Less efficient chipset (12nm Helio P90)
- Shorter battery life
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 9E’s older chipset, it’s likely to feature a less efficient panel. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so expect standard LCD panels rather than OLED. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to reinforce the rugged design. Color accuracy will likely be similar, leaning towards practical rather than color-critical.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, rugged phones often prioritize practicality over cutting-edge camera technology. Both devices likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the image processing capabilities will likely differ. The Dimensity 6100+ in the WP52 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 6100+ also suggests enhanced AI-powered scene recognition and image optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP52’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture than the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Helio P90 (12nm). While both utilize an octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76/A75 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, the 6nm process of the Dimensity 6100+ provides significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management. This means the WP52 will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling, benefiting users engaged in gaming or resource-intensive applications. The Armor 9E, while capable, will likely exhibit more performance degradation under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP52’s 65:13h endurance is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what’s typically expected from a rugged phone. This is a direct result of the Dimensity 6100+’s power efficiency. Both phones offer 18W wired charging, meaning charge times will be comparable. However, the WP52’s larger battery capacity and efficient chipset will allow it to be used for considerably longer between charges. The WP52 also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP52 if you need a rugged phone that can handle demanding tasks and offers exceptional battery life for extended outdoor use. It’s ideal for professionals in field work, adventurers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from a power source. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize a proven, reliable platform and are less concerned with pushing the limits of performance or maximizing battery endurance. It’s a solid choice for basic rugged phone functionality at a potentially lower price point.